Alexander Terminasyan 5:29pm The election method used by the Supreme Court of the United States Justices has shifted significantly during the span of three decades, as detailed in the documentary "Supreme

Revenge." The first obvious difference is the method's enhanced partisanship, as seen by disagreeable hearings and greater investigation of candidates' political views. Confirmation disputes for candidates that include Robert Bork in 1987 and Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 demonstrate that this pattern is continuing. A number of factors impact these adjustments. This political divide among political factions is getting bigger, giving the nominations to the Supreme Court key battlefields during a larger electoral conflict. In addition, the rise of lobbying groups, along with growing coverage by the media, has created public awareness and put pressure on the process of nominating candidates. The filibuster faction movement and assassinating characters have recently been progressively more common tactics in nomination campaigns. As a result of this, the proper political duty of the United States Supreme Court in the framework of politics has grown to be a topic of controversy. Several call on for a more engaged justice for legislating and protecting freedoms for individuals, whereas others endorse a restricted judicial which listens to elected representatives. Complaints have also been made regarding the Court's independence and the potential decline of the public's trust in the justice system as a consequence of the politicization of the procedure for confirming judges. Finally, striking a balance between a strong, independent court and avoiding excessive politicization remains a difficulty. The documentary emphasizes the tremendous impact of Supreme Court appointments on the nation's legal landscape, emphasizing the importance of a thorough and deliberate confirmation process that protects the Court's integrity and independence. Reply 31 HBO max need 2 response post ||150 words each (Initial post and solution attached in the reference files) Dec 8 10:45/nPaulmalo Malosoledispa 7:11pm For the past three decades, the confirmation process for a U.S. Supreme Court Justice has experienced significant transformations, shaped by various factors. One of the main changes is the increasing polarization within the political landscape, both in Congress and in the public. This contrast in ideologies has turned Supreme Court nominations into ideological battlegrounds, with nominees facing careful examination based on their perceived judicial ideologies. The evolution of media and communication has also played a crucial role. The 24-hour news cycle and the rise of social media have intensified the public spotlight on nominees, contributing to the intense nature of the confirmation process. The passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg marked a pivotal moment in recent confirmation history. Her death, which occurred close to a presidential election, started a debate about the timing of nominations and their potential impact on the Court's composition. This event heightened the political stakes surrounding Supreme Court confirmations. Looking back, the confirmation battles of Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas also left lasting imprints on the process. Bork faced intense opposition due to his perceived extreme views, leading to a more politicized approach to judicial nominations. The contentious confirmation of Clarence Thomas, marked by allegations of sexual harassment, highlighted the intersection of personal and political factors in the process. Considering the appropriate political role of the U.S. Supreme Court, opinions differ due to one's ideology. Some advocate for a more restrained, interpretive role, emphasizing judicial independence. Others argue for a more active role, with the Court addressing societal issues. However, the political role of the US Supreme Court has always been and will always be to promote equal justice and to ensure that all other branches of the government recognize the limitations of their power in each branch. Reply C