ASSIGNMENT BUILDING Burj Khalifa Marina 101 Princess Tower Almas Tower Marina 101 Gevora Hotel Khalid Al Attar Tower/n FV3103 Assignment 1 (this contributes 20% to your overall module mark) Details The aim of the coursework is to demonstrate your ability to evaluate, compare and contrast risk using a fire risk assessment methodology and to show how differing methods of analysing risk can yield differing results for the same building. In order to complete this assignment successfully you will produce, present and defend poster that addresses the following: As a fire risk assessor your task is to advise the building management company about the fire risks in the tall building allocated to you. You will evaluate the fire risks and hazards using guidance contained in PAS79 2020 and the 5x5 risk matrix approach. You will carry out an evaluation based on 5 key aspects of the fire risk in the building and include appropriate control measures to reduce the risk to an acceptable level. You will compile and present your findings on an A3 poster (which we can print for you) you will then defend during the class All the class posters will be posted on the walls of the room and you will have the chance to question your peers about their posters. Assessors will view each poster and ask you questions about your poster and they will be interested to hear your observations, comparisons and justifications. This is your opportunity to showcase (defend) your findings. Remember that your evaluation of the risks is important for helping the building management company arrive at informed decisions about fire risk to the owner or occupiers of the building. Learning outcomes This assessment will test your ability to meet the learning outcomes as described in your module descriptor, specifically: 1. Employ a range of qualitative and quantitative methods for application to risk assessment 2. Critically evaluate a risk assessment 3. Assess relevant documents and communicate the essential and important points Indicativemarkingscheme Classification Grade Relevance 20% Directly relevant to title. Able to address the implications, assumptions Knowledge 20% Makes effective use of a comprehensive range of theory and practice knowledge. Demonstrates ability in the manipulation and 96 and nuances of 89 the title. 1st Relevance to 81 practice is thoroughly and material to 74 explicitly addressed. solid transfer of subject demonstrate a understanding of the issues in both Analysis Argument & Structure Originality 15% A comprehensive analysis of the material resulting in clear and illuminating conclusions. 20% Coherent and logically structured, making creative use of an appropriate mode of argument and/or theoretical model. 15% Distinctive work showing independent thought and critical engagement with alternative views. Presentation 10% A very well written answer with standard spelling and syntax. Style is lucid and resourceful with an appropriate bibliographical apparatus. 2.1 theory and 80 68 65 662 Directly relevant to title. Is able to demonstrate effective practice relevance. practice. Makes effective use of good theory and practice knowledge. Manipulates and transfers some material to demonstrate a clear grasp of the themes, questions and issues in theory and Good analysis of the material resulting in clear and logical conclusions. Generally coherent and logically constructed. Uses an appropriate mode of argument or theoretical model. Contains some distinctive or independent thinking. Beginning to formulate an independent position Well written with standard spelling and syntax. Style is lucid utilising an appropriate format and bibliographical apparatus. practice. range of relevant theoretical and Generally Adequate addresses the title, knowledge of a fair sometimes addresses practice related 58 irrelevant material with issues. evidence of an 2.2 55 Relevance to practice appreciation of its significance. 52 effectively addressed, may be implicit in places. Some degree of irrelevance to the title is common. Only the most obvious issues are addressed level and in 48 at a superficial 3 45 42 unchallenging terms. Relevance to practice is superficially addressed and rarely made explicit Basic understanding of a limited range of relevant theoretical and practice related material. Adequate analytical treatment, with occasional descriptive or narrative passages which lack clear analytical purpose. Conclusions are clear. Largely descriptive or narrative in style with limited evidence of analytical capability. Conclusions are not always clear or logical Adequate attempt to construct a coherent argument, but may suffer loss of focus and consistency. Issues at stake may lack clarity or theoretical models couched in simplistic terms. A basic argument is evident but tends to be supported by assertion and lacks proper development. Coherence and clarity are evident only intermittently Sound work which expresses a personal position, often in broad terms and tends towards uncritical conformity to one or more standard views of the topic. Largely derivative. No personal view is adequately formulated Wholly uncritical and conforming to one or more standard views. Competently written with only minor lapses from standard spelling and syntax. Style is readable with acceptable format and bibliographical status. Style of presentation makes reading difficult. Deficiencies in spelling, syntax, format or bibliographical apparatus impact significantly upon clarity. 1 understanding of a narrow range of relevant Relevance to A limited the title is intermittent or missing. 35* The topic is theoretical and reduced to its 30* vaguest and Fail least 25 challenging terms. 10 Relevance to practice is barely considered or practice related material or a lack of basic knowledge in either or both theory and practice necessary for an understanding of the topic Heavy dependence on description and/or narrative. Paraphrase is common. Evidence of analysis is lacking. Clear and logical conclusions are sparse Little evidence of coherent argument. There is a lack of development and the work may be repetitive and/or thin. Almost wholly derivative. The writer's contribution rarely goes beyond simplifying paraphrase. No evidence of personal thought. Poorly written with numerous deficiencies in syntax, spelling, expression and presentation. The writer may achieve clarity (if at all) only by using simplistic or repetitious style. * can be compensated not at all. 2

Solved: ASSIGNMENT BUILDING Burj Khalifa Marina 101 Princess Tower Almas Tower

Home
questions and answers
fv3103 assignment 1 this contributes 20 to your overall module mark de

Question

ASSIGNMENT BUILDING Burj Khalifa Marina 101 Princess Tower Almas Tower Marina 101 Gevora Hotel Khalid Al Attar Tower/n FV3103 Assignment 1 (this contributes 20% to your overall module mark) Details The aim of the coursework is to demonstrate your ability to evaluate, compare and contrast risk using a fire risk assessme