Instructions • Read the case study on pages 104-120 of the textbook. • Answer the following questions: 1. After reading this case, what do you think were the main causes of the Financial Crisis? Has anything changed today? Explain. 2. How can a firm motivate salespeople who work on commission (as many mortgage brokers did in the run- up to the Financial Crisis) to sell products that are in their customers' interest rather than their own? 3. Is socialism a viable alternative to capitalism? Provide examples and sources to support your answer. 4. Do you think corporations' commitments to stakeholder capitalism is genuine? Requirements Each answer should be approximately ½ page, single-spaced, size 12 font. Each answer should include information from the textbook and lecture as applicable. • Include a cover page with your names and student numbers. • Do not include the questions, only the question numbers. • All pages should be numbered. • Include in-text citations with a reference page, following the APA 7th edition citation guide - this is a formal paper. Minimum of four references (one must be our textbook). Criteria Question 1 Analysis Question 2 Demonstrates knowledge and understanding Question 3 Demonstrates knowledge and understanding Excellent 5 points Demonstrates exceptional ability to engage in critical thinking and writing. Shows exceptional evidence of ability to draw conclusions from concepts learned. An exceptional grasp of subject matter is demonstrated, including understanding of relevant concepts and theories related to the topic. Shows exceptional evidence of ability to draw conclusions from concepts learned. An exceptional grasp of subject matter is demonstrated, including understanding of relevant concepts and theories related to the topic. Shows exceptional evidence Good 4 points Demonstrates good ability to engage in critical thinking and writing. Shows strong evidence of ability to draw conclusions from concepts learned. A good grasp of subject matter is demonstrated. Shows some evidence of drawing conclusions from concepts learned. A good grasp of subject matter is demonstrated. Shows some evidence of drawing conclusions from concepts learned. Fair 3 points Minimally demonstrates some amount of critical thinking and writing. Shows weak evidence of ability to draw conclusions from concepts learned. A basic grasp of subject matter is demonstrated. Most of the content demonstrate an understanding of the lesson's subject matter. A basic grasp of subject matter is demonstrated. Most of the content demonstrate an understanding of the lesson's subject matter. Poor 2 points Fails to engage in scholarly thinking and writing. Content consistently does not demonstrate an understanding of the lesson's subject matter or it is non- existent. Content consistently does not demonstrate an understanding of the lesson's subject matter or it is non- existent. Criterion Score /5 15 /5 Question 4 Analysis Source of Documents Grammar, requirements, APA style/format references and in-text citations Total Demonstrates exceptional ability to engage in critical thinking and writing. Shows exceptional evidence of ability to draw conclusions from concepts learned. Selected documents are exceptional, relevant and authentic. Virtually free from mechanical, grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. All assignment requirements were met. Added 3 or more references to the text or other resources within the response. Follows appropriate APA formatting with no error. Demonstrates good ability to engage in critical thinking and writing. Shows strong evidence of ability to draw conclusions from concepts learned. Selected documents are relevant and authentic. Occasional minor errors that do not distract the reader. The majority of assignment requirements were met. Added 2 references to the text or other resources within the response. Follows appropriate APA formatting with minor errors. Minimally demonstrates some amount of critical thinking and writing. Shows weak evidence of ability to draw conclusions from concepts learned. Selected documents are relevant, but some are not reliable sources. Some significant errors are present, but the meaning is clear. Approximately half of assignment requirements were met. Added 1 or fewer references to the text or other resources within the response. Attempts appropriate APA formatting with multiple errors. Fails to engage in scholarly thinking and writing. Selected documents are irrelevant and not reliable sources. Errors are distracting but the meaning of the response are still clear. Only some assignment requirements were met. No references were displayed throughout the content. No attempt to use APA formatting is used when required. /5 /5 /5 / 30

Solved: Instructions • Read the case study on pages 104-120 of the textbook.

Home
questions and answers
instructions read the case study on pages 104 120 of the textbook answ

Question

Instructions • Read the case study on pages 104-120 of the textbook. • Answer the following questions: 1. After reading this case, what do you think were the main causes of the Financial Crisis? Has anything changed today? Explain. 2. How can a firm motivate salespeople who work on commission (as many mortgage brokers