Instructions This work is the continuation for the previous work, you can check previous work instructions and solution in the reference section Basically, in this you need to do fill the provided PPT outline template based on the research paper attached Student note: in the outline it shows that there is 3 arguments and one counter argument for my essay there is 2 arguments and 1 counter argument So, tutor can skip argument 3 in the outline/n The Case for Stricter Fast Food Advertising Regulations Hanan Fadel Gulf University of Science and Technology Mr. Joshua Guzman ENGL 110 English Composition 1 1 May 2024 Fast food advertising has become common in modern society, hitting social media, television, and radio with carefully planned and compelling promotions, while obesity-related concerns have been rising, making stricter fast food advertising rules necessary. Studying the negative impacts of fast-food advertising on public health and target consumers ability to change their eating patterns shows that the target marketing campaigns need stronger instructions. Thus, fast food advertising requires stricter rules since it harms public health especially obesity and it has negative impact on children's dietary habits. The need for strict fast food advertising rules is based on overwhelming scientific proof of their contribution to obesity reduction. An important example of the effectiveness of regulatory measures is the 2019 ban on food advertising high in fat, salt, and sugar across the Transport for London network (Institute for Fiscal Studies, n.d.). Thus, the resulting number of 94,867 fewer incidences of obesity indicates that the rates fell by 4.8 percent. It is a direct indicator of the impact advertising has on the public health status, resulting in the immediate necessity for policies to prevent its harmful effects. In addition to decreasing obesity, the effects of these strategies will also result in large health care reductions and important benefits for society. Governments can encourage healthier lifestyle through restricting the advertisement of fast food, which will therefore result in a healthy population with an improved quality of life. Moreover, it is possible to see the positive experiences of the success of such regulations not only in the London transport system. Many countries across the world also placed similar restrictions on unhealthy food advertisements, and the noticeable decrease in obesity rates occurred as the results. For example, in Chile, food marketing strictly controlled and there is a ban on advertising unhealthy foods to children less than 14 years old. According to the World Health Organisation data, the childhood obesity rates in Chile do show a considerable decrease. In Norway, where there is a restriction imposed on advertising on TV aimed to the 12 years old and below children, there has been an improvement of their dietary preferences (World Health Organization, 2020). It is possible to conclude that the effects of such prompting can have significant positive benefits for the society in general, not just to adecrease in a frequency of obesity. By preventing the advertising of foods that promote unhealthy eating habits, governments can make people healthier, prevent diet-relateddiseases, and decrease the pressure on healthcare systems. To sum up, the fact that fast food advertising needs to be prohibited as a technique of ensuring that the individuals meet their health needs. Moreover, another argument for imposing stricter regulations upon fast-food advertising concerns its serious effect on children's eating patterns. As suggested in the works from 'The New Daily' and 'Obesity Evidence Hub', (The New Daily, 2020; Obesity Evidence Hub, n.d.), which refer to particular studies concerning the issue, the ads of junk food have been shown to manipulate the weaker minds of the youth to accept unhealthy eating practices and thus promote the culture of global obesity. Taking advantage of children's developmental characteristics, the consumerist enterprises develop the associations of fast food as a positive experience, thus increasing the desire and consumption. Seeing as how impactful the commercials are towards children's actual choice, health authorities should impose more stricter rules in controlling fast food commercials towards a younger target audience to ensure their safety and healthier eating habits. In addition, a considerable amount of research has highlighted the lasting impact of early exposure to unhealthy food advertising on individuals' long-term dietary preferences and consumption patterns (Boyland et al., 2016; Story et al., 2020). Supporting data showsthat frequent viewing to advertisements for high-fat, high-sugar, and high-salt foods not only has an effect of converting unhealthy eating behaviours but also leads to the adoption of the poor dietary standards (The New Daily, 2020). As a result, individuals tend to eat the same kinds of foods throughout their adult lives. Given the prevalence of such advertising material on multiple platforms, including those that appear to be designed for kids, the biological and psychological impact on children has become extremely significant: "these stimuli promote fast food and monotonous diets of processed foods and preformed food items that require minimal preparation" (Obesity Evidence Hub, n.d.). Since children are not used to recognizing advertising material for what it is, it is no wonder that they develop a strongdesire for unhealthy foods, with the cravings persisting well into adolescence and adulthood. While fast food advertising tends to highlight the element of personal choice, it should be subject to stricter regulation in order to protect vulnerable populations from the toxic influence of manipulative media. According to the research, people, especially children, are not able to perceive the persuasive nature of advertisements and are open to being misled (Boyland et al., 2016). Furthermore, the aggressive manner in which fast food ads are implemented often virtually harasses people with continuous stimulation, encouraging them to make impulsive choices (Story et al., 2020). Since most people are not equipped with all the necessary knowledge, some levels of protection of their interests should be maintained. In this way, strict regulations and restrictions on advertisement by the government are not designed to interfere with personal choices but aim at protecting people from the false or misleading of advertisement and marketing tactics. In addition, it empowers people with trustworthy information. This, in turn, will have a positive impact on the public and lead to a healthier lifestyle. To sum up, the evidence presented in the paper reveals that fast food advertisement has a negative influence on society by promoting unhealthy eating patterns leading to food-related issues, such as obesity. Reviewing the success of various regulatory measures implemented in different cases and the principles of manipulations used by advertisers allows concluding that the number of rules should be increased to ensure the populations health and encourage better dietary choices. Therefore, policymakers should make greater efforts to pass stricter regulations that could raise the conditions of fast-food advertisements and promote a healthy way of life./n Name: ID: Course/Sec ENGL 110- Date ENGL 110 Research Paper PowerPoint Presentation Presentation Title/Topic: Outline Instructions: Use this outline to organize your presentation. Do NOT write paragraphs. Remember that your final recorded presentation should not be read, but rather you should have note cards with small notes to help remind you of the topic. Make sure you practice your presentation before you record it. I. Introduction: Greetings: Topic: Overview: (for your Overview Slide) Background information: (brief interesting facts about the topic or why this topic is important today) The main idea of your presentation, i.e. There are two-three arguments and one counterargument of X (topic). II. Body (Main arguments/counterargument supported by relevant details) Argument #1: Evidence: Argument #2: Evidence: Argument #3: Evidence: Counterargument #2: Refutation evidence: III. Conclusion Restate your arguments and give a summary of the main details. Concluding comment: prediction/suggestion/advice/call for action/solution Sources: list your main sources (for your last slide). Copy and paste your references list: Thank your audience

Solved: Instructions This work is the continuation for the previous work, you

Home
questions and answers
instructions this work is the continuation for the previous work you c

Question

Instructions This work is the continuation for the previous work, you can check previous work instructions and solution in the reference section Basically, in this you need to do fill the provided PPT outline template based on the research paper attached Student note: in the outline it shows that there is 3 arguments a