Module Title: Chemistry in industry Assignment Title: Safety case study ICA ● IN-COURSE ASSESSMENT (ICA) SPECIFICATION Module Leader: paul russell Module Code: Deadline Date for Report: 1| Page Deadline Time

for Report: Submission Method: Online (Blackboard) Online Submission Notes: Please follow carefully the instructions given on the Assignment Specification Middlesbrough Tower When Extenuating Circumstances (e.g. extension) has been granted, a fully completed and signed Extenuating Circumstances form must be submitted to the School Reception or emailed to Central Assignments Office (Middlesbrough Tower M2.08) Notes: All work (including DVDs etc) needs to be secured in a plastic envelope or a folder and clearly marked with the student name, number and module title. An Assignment Front Sheet should be fully completed before the work is submitted. When Extenuating Circumstances (e.g. extension) has been granted, a fully completed and signed Extenuating Circumstances form must be submitted to the School Reception or emailed to FULL DETAILS OF THE ASSIGNMENT ARE ATTACHED INCLUDING MARKING & GRADING CRITERIA You are required to submit a word document solution for the problem given on page 2. Other forms of document will not be marked. The document should be no longer than 6 pages (Title, abstract contents and references pages do not count towards the page limit). Any additional pages will not be marked. You will need to use Microsoft Excel or comparable software to complete this assignment. Your report should contain a clear commentary of the calculations carried out and appropriate sample calculations should be provided. Your answer to this problem will be given as a formal report. Marks will be awarded for the presentation of the report which should comply with the following: The report should be written in third party past tense. It should contain as a minimum: Title page Abstract not more than 150 words font: Times; 12 point; 1.5 line spacing. Contents page Each section should be numbered with appropriate sub-headings also numbered. The page numbers should also be given. Main report Not more than 8 pages plus 2 pages of appendices Times Roman 12-point 1.5 spaced justified text. To include as minimum: Introduction, sections describing calculations (provide enough information to allow your calculations to be followed, must include all assumptions made). Conclusions References Your work should be supported by appropriate cross referencing and referencing of source material using the Harvard system. Appendices not more than 2 pages of supporting information 2|Page [10 marks] Assignment Brief BP Texas city explosion The student will prepare a short report on the Texas city incident. The report will contain: - A brief discussion of the incident (less than 1 page). [10 marks] Calculations to determine the TNT equivalence of the resulting blast and comparison with the actual inquiry figures. The report should present an aerial view of the plant delineated with the appropriate blast zones. Calculations supporting the construction of the blast zone contours and a critic of the contents of each blast zone should be provided. [ 30 marks] The student is expected to critically evaluate the safety management practice used by BP against the HSE prescribed safety management system [ ISO 45001 health and safety management standard] for the case study. The student is expected to lay out evidence-based conclusions when highlighting agreement/alignment and differences between BP's actual operating practice, procedures, plant design etc., and that prescribed by ISO 45001 [ 40 marks] Draw conclusions at the end of the report about the incident and how it could have been avoided including a discussion of how internal and external whistle blowing could have helped to prevent this incident. [10 marks] The reassessment for this assignment will be to put right any errors/omissions in the original assessment 3| Page U Teesside University STUDENT MODULE Code ENG 3002-n Title Chemical engineering in industry ASSESSMENT Title Chemical engineering in industry ica HIGH QUALITY INDICATORS A well-presented report 10 marks A report that effectively communicates and demonstrates critical understanding of the major issues pertaining to the safety management system. 20 marks Accurate calculations pertaining to TNT equivalence and blast zones. 30 marks Good abstract and report organisation including a quality contents table, main body, relevant conclusions, literature review and references, clear formatting. 10 marks Competent Analysis of the effective implementation of the safety management system adopted by the company for the case study selected. 20 marks Critical discussion of the role whistle blowing could have played in the prevention of this incident 10 marks School of computing Engineering and Digital technologies Assessment Feedback Sheet Further Comments Final Mark 4| Page A Excellent 1st Name Leader Paul russell GRADE/CLASSIFICATION B Very Good 2i D Good Satisfactory 2ii 3rd ■ ENGLISH AND PRESENTATION (the following areas need care and attention) Grammar Paragraphing Spelling Figures and Tables Marked by: Date: F Fail ■ Weighting POOR QUALITY INDICATORS A poorly presented or incomplete report 40% A report that does not demonstrates critical understanding of the major issues pertaining to the safety management system Inaccurate/ incomplete calculations pertaining to TNT equivalence and blast zones Poorly written badly structured report Poor or incomplete Analysis of the effective implementation of the safety management system adopted by the company for the case study selected Poor discussion or omission of the discussion to role whistle blowing could have played in this incident A = 100-70%, B = 69-60%, C = 59-50%, D = 49-40%, F = 39-0% Citation References