perspectives an open introduction to cultural anthropology nina brown
Search for question
Question
PERSPECTIVES:
AN OPEN
INTRODUCTION TO CULTURAL
ANTHROPOLOGY
Nina Brown, Thomas Mcllwraith, Laura Tubelle de
González
The American Anthropological Association
Arlington, VA CC
i
Perspectives: An Open Introduction to Cultural Anthropology by
Nina Brown, Thomas Mcllwraith, Laura Tubelle de González is
licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
International License, except where otherwise noted.
Under this CC BY-NC 4.0 copyright license you are free to:
Share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt-remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the
license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any
reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor
endorses you or your use.
You may not use the material for commercial
NonCommercial
purposes.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or
technological measures that legally restrict others from doing
anything the license permits. Anthropology in Our Moment in History: Interview
with Philippe Bourgois
Robert Borofsky, Hawaii Pacific University, Center for a
Public Anthropology
borofsky@hpu.edu
How did you become an anthropologist?
Discovering anthropology for me was like falling in love.
I was a freshman in college and I knew nothing about the
subject. I didn't have a major. I took one of those big
introductory classes in a large lecture hall because I was
curious, but I didn't really have any idea what anthropology
might be.
The very first lecture blew my mind. It was by an old-
style style anthropologist talking about his fieldwork in the
Amazon. He introduced us to the Yanomami, an indigenous
people who were at the center of a huge anthropological
debate about the nature of violence at the time: How much
of human violence is cultural? How much of it is at the
essence of human nature? How much of it is imposed by
larger historical and economic forces? The teacher
described to us their “shaman” who sniff hallucinogenic
drugs to communicate with spirits and to protect their
village from sickness and attack by neighbors. The
Yanomami shaman are the Amazonian equivalent to our
philosophers, scientists, doctors and religious or political
officials. I couldn't believe what I was hearing. Here is an
academic discipline that sends its practitioners around the
1 2 PERSPECTIVES
world to immerse themselves in utterly unfamiliar, foreign
cultures in order to explore the meaning of human
existence.
I adored the class even with all its old-fashioned faults-it
did, after all, “exoticize” indigenous people as if they were
not our contemporaries but lived in a bubble, oblivious to
the effects of global power relations and colonial conquest.
The teacher did alert us, however, to the contemporary
invasion of non-indigenous settlers, miners and cattle
barons who were and still are destroying indigenous
ways of life all around the world. I quickly signed up to
major in anthropology.
What do you find special about anthropology?
There are a few things that I think are magical about
anthropology but, what I like best is our methodology of
"participant-observation ethnography", our insight on
"cultural relativism" and our multi-disciplinarity. Our
methodology is extraordinarily powerful but simple. To put
it commonsensically, it is the technique of deep “hanging
out" in a setting to attempt to see the world through the
eyes of the people or society you want to find out about.
You engage with people in a friendly, empathetic way, and
participate in their daily life activities so as to avoid
distorting interactions or calling excessive attention to
yourself. This allows you to break through appearances and
simultaneously experience emotionally and document
rationally life in that setting. We have developed strategies of
note-taking, tape-recording and, most importantly, of self-
reflexive skepticism. You have to learn to be careful not to
see only what you want to see and not to confuse the way
you want the world to be with the way the world really is. ANTHROPOLOGY IN OUR MOMENT IN HISTORY: INTERVIEW WITH PHILIPPE
BOURGOIS 3
You try to figure out how things really work by being aware
of your own biases.
Participant-observation methodology forces you to break
through the barriers of status that limit people's lives:
economic class, race and ethnicity, gender, and social
conventions to name a few. Anthropology tells you: "Go
out there and explore the world; open your mind to all kinds
of different perspectives and settings —or take a long close
critical look at your own society. Treat your own culture and
its common senses as if you were an outsider confronting
the bizarre logic of an exotic people for the first time. You
discover that there is nothing more normal or right about
your culture than anyone else's culture."
Anthropology pushes you to dare to break through, what
we have called the "intimate apartheids" (Bourgois and
Schonberg 2007) that confine us to our narrow little
segregated worlds that we find most comfortable. Too often
these intimate apartheids turn us into ethnocentric, or even
racist individuals, who think so highly of ourselves and our
way of being that we end up disrespecting and mistreating
anyone who is different from us.
Respect for others is a related core value of anthropology
and is reflected in our core value of cultural relativism
which is not a theory, but simply a heuristic device, (a
technique) that enables us to learn about others without
being blinded by prejudgments. In a nutshell, cultural
relativism declares that cultures are not good or bad; they
all have a logic. Our job as anthropologists-and indeed as
human beings is not to judge culture along righteous
moral lines, but to find out how its internal logic makes it
operate. Often the first reaction of people confronted with
something different is, "Ewww gross!" simply because it is