Topic: not observing your country's culture disconnects you from it Assessment Task Information Key details: Assessment title: Module Name: Module Code: Tutor's Name: Assessment will be set on: Feedback opportunities: Assessment weighting: Spoken assessment (collaborative) & accompanying collaborative written component: Structured Group Debate Logic and Critical Thinking FC310 Assessment Instructions What do you need to do for this assessment? Task: You are required to write Debate Notes and participate in a Structured Debate. The tone of your notes and spoken language should be intended for an academic audience. The aim of this assessment is to construct, present and defend an argument in speech and writing on a hypothetical or a real-world issue. Week 11 Written feedback from class tutor to be available two weeks after the last debate has taken place. Feedback accessible via Turn-it-in. Your topic will be the same as the one you have previously chosen for your Structured Debate formative assessment. ● 40% Guidance: For this assessment you should make use of the following tasks that you have already completed. These activities have been designed to support this formative assessment: Scheduled debate practice in class time Peer feedback on debate practice in class time ● Tutor feedback from the Structured Debate formative assessment Structure of Debate Notes: Please note: Each student is required to submit Structured Debate Notes on which they should work individually. However, in preparation for the live delivery of the Structured Debate, students from the same team, working on the same case (either Affirmative or Negative) should work together to plan the smooth delivery of their specific debate roles. You will be marked individually in all aspects (see How this section will be marked section). Kaplan International Pathways Cover page (excluded from the word count) The cover page should include the motion of your debate. Notes 1. Two supporting arguments for the Affirmative or Negative case (depending on stance) (200 words approx.) 2. Two anticipated counterarguments for the opposite team's case (200 words approx.) 3. Two appropriate rebuttals (linked to counterargument) (200 words approx.) 1 kaplanpathways.com References (excluded from the word count) In this section, you should include a list of all the sources you have referred to in your Notes. Structure of Debate: In a debating team, each speaker will have a specific role that they must fulfil to play their part in the team. The structure of your debate will depend upon your role in the debate team. Debate team of 6 students (3 on 3)* 1st Affirmative (5 min. per student approx.) 1st Negative 2nd Affirmative 2nd Negative 3rd Affirmative 3rd Negative Points of Information (POI) (excluded from the debate timings) Each debater should offer at least one POI (max. 30 sec.) and accept at least one POI (max. 30 sec.) *Alternative Debate team groupings can be used depending on class size Debate team of 3 students (2 on 1) 1st Affirmative (5 min. per student approx.) 1st Negative 2nd Affirmative Debate team of 4 students (2 on 2) 1st Affirmative (5 min. per student approx.) 1st Negative 2nd Affirmative 2nd Negative Debate team of 5 students (3 on 2) 1st Affirmative (5 min. per student approx.) 1st Negative 2nd Affirmative 2nd Negative 3rd Affirmative Roles of Debaters: Debate team of 6 students (3 on 3) 1st Affirmative ● ● ● ● state the motion and define their team's understanding of what it means provide short background information about the topic present a summary of the proposition team's argument outline briefly what each speaker in their team will talk about present the first half of the proposition points 1st Negative accept or reject the definitions given present a summary of the opposition team's argument Kaplan International Pathways kaplanpathways.com ● 2nd Affirmative ● ● ● ● 2nd Negative ● ● 3rd Affirmative ● 3rd Negative ● ● outline briefly what each of the opposition speakers will say rebut some of the main points of the first proposition speaker present the first half of the opposition points ● Debate team of 3 students (2 on 1) reaffirm the propositions team's argument rebut some of the main points presented by the 1st opposition speaker present the second half of the proposition points 1st Affirmative ● state the motion and define their team's understanding of what it means provide short background information about the topic present a summary of the proposition team's argument outline briefly what each speaker in their team will talk about ● present the proposition points reaffirm the oppositions team's argument rebut some of the main points presented by the 2nd Affirmative speaker present the second half of the opposition points ● reaffirm the propositions team's argument rebut all the remaining points raised by the opposition team present a summary of the proposition team's points conclude the debate for the proposition team 1st Negative ● reaffirm the oppositions team's argument rebut all the remaining points of the proposition team present a summary of the opposition team's points conclude the debate for the opposition team ● outline briefly what they will say rebut all main points of the first proposition speaker present the opposition points conclude the debate for the opposition team ● ● 2nd Affirmative ● reaffirm the propositions team's argument rebut all points raised by the opposition present a summary of the proposition team's points ● conclude the debate for the proposition team Debate team of 4 students (2 on 2) accept or reject the definitions given 1st Affirmative state the motion and define their team's understanding of what it means provide short background information about the topic ● present a summary of the proposition team's argument outline briefly what each speaker in their team will talk about ● present the first half of the proposition points 1st Negative accept or reject the definitions given present a summary of the opposition team's argument Kaplan International Pathways kaplanpathways.com ● 2nd Affirmative ● ● ● ● ● 2nd Negative ● ● ● ● Debate team of 5 students (3 on 2) ● 1st Affirmative ● ● outline briefly what each of the opposition speakers will say rebut some of the main points of the first proposition speaker present the first half of the opposition points ● reaffirm the propositions team's argument rebut all the main points presented by the 1st opposition speaker present the second half of the proposition points 1st Negative ● present a summary of the proposition team's points conclude the debate for the proposition team ● reaffirm the oppositions team's argument rebut all the remaining points raised by the proposition team present the second half of the opposition points present a summary of the opposition team's points conclude the debate for the opposition team ● 2nd Affirmative state the motion and define their team's understanding of what it means provide short background information about the topic present a summary of the proposition team's argument outline briefly what each speaker in their team will talk about present the first half of the proposition points ● accept or reject the definitions given present a summary of the opposition team's argument outline briefly what each of the opposition speakers will say rebut some of the main points of the first proposition speaker present the first half of the opposition points 2nd Negative reaffirm the propositions team's argument rebut some of the main points presented by the 1st opposition speaker present the second half of the proposition points reaffirm the oppositions team's argument rebut all the remaining points of the proposition team present the second half of the opposition points present a summary of the opposition team's points conclude the debate for the opposition team 3rd Affirmative reaffirm the propositions team's argument rebut all the remaining points raised by the opposition team present a summary of the proposition team's points ● conclude the debate for the proposition team Kaplan International Pathways kaplanpathways.com Theory and/or task resources required for the assessment: You must conduct secondary research for this assessment finding relevant sources independently. A minimum of 5 English language sources are required for this assessment. While you must use sources properly and engage with them critically, they do not have to be academic sources. You may use other types of sources, such as newspapers, broadcast media, social media, documentaries, sources from NGOs or charities, etc., but remember that the opposing team may use the type of source against you. Referencing style: You should refer to a minimum of 5 relevant sources for your Structured Debate assessment. You must use Harvard style referencing conventions and include a complete reference list at the end of your Structured Debate Notes. A full bibliography is NOT required. Expected word count: You are expected to produce 600 words (+/- 10%), following the specific structure outlined above. Learning Outcomes Assessed: Construct, present and defend an argument in speech and writing Analyse and evaluate arguments in speech and written texts Apply key ideas relating to logic, reasoning and argumentation and apply these in debating hypothetical and real-world issues Submission Requirements: You must include the following paragraph on your title page: How to avoid academic misconduct You should follow academic conventions and regulations when completing your assessed work. If there is evidence that you have done any of the following, whether intentionally or not, you risk getting a zero mark: Plagiarism & poor scholarship Collusion ● stealing ideas or work from another person (experts or students) using quotations from sources without paraphrasing and using citations working together with someone else on an individual assessment, e.g., your work is corrected, rephrased or added to by another (both parties would be guilty) Buying or commissioning work submitting work as your own that someone else produced (whether you paid for it or not) We confirm that this assignment is our own work. Where we have referred to academic sources, we have provided in-text citations and included the sources in the final reference list. Cheating ● ● copying the work of another student using resources or aids that are not permitted for the assessment Fabrication submitting work, e.g., laboratory work, which is partly or completely made up. This includes claiming that work was done by yourself alone when it was actually done by a group Personation claiming to be another student and taking an assessment instead of them (both parties guilty) Specific formatting instructions: You must type your assessment in Arial font 11, with single spacing. You must submit the assessment electronically via the VLE module page. Please ensure you submit it via Turnitin. Kaplan International Pathways kaplanpathways.com

Solved: Topic: not observing your country's culture disconnects you from it A

Home
questions and answers
topic not observing your country s culture disconnects you from it ass

Question

Topic: not observing your country's culture disconnects you from it Assessment Task Information Key details: Assessment title: Module Name: Module Code: Tutor's Name: Assessment will be set on: Feedback opportunities: Assessment weighting: Spoken assessment (collaborative) & accompanying collaborative written componen