religion in international relations. Yet, there has been a resurgence of interest recently in
these topics. Explain how cultural, racial and religious dynamics have been used to explain
developments in world politics and highlight any potential problems or dangers you see with
these approaches.
2) Explain why Christopher Layne believes that "Over the next two decades, international
politics will be shaped by whether the international system remains unipolar or becomes
multipolar." Why is this question so important? What do the various readings Layne reviews
and some of the other material we covered in class suggest we should expect to see here?
3) Individual leaders are often presumed to be rational decision-makers. Yet, as Drezner
puts it, "human beings cannot be reduced to bloodless calculating machines, despite the
assumptions of rational choice theorists. All individuals have fears, foibles, and failings that
cause behavior to deviate from how a dispassionate, rational decision maker would behave."
Describe and explain at least four of the information processing mechanisms or
psychological dynamics that have been identified which affect how individual leaders make
foreign policy decisions and indicate how they do or do not suggest deviations from rational
behavior.
4) Describe and explain what non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are. Summarize and
explain Richard Price's arguments on the role that NGOs and transnational civil society
played in the campaign to ban anti-personnel landmines. What does this suggest to Price
about the relative influence that NGOs do or do not have on international relations? Assess
the significance of and limits to the impact of NGOs on international relations and indicate
whether you share Price's assessment in this regard.
5) Using either current or historical examples, identify and explain the various ways in which
states conduct international relations or the various tools available to them in pursuing their
foreign policy goals and interests.
6) Individuals remain peripheral or insignificant actors in international relations. Agree or
disagree and explain why.