Search for question
Question

2:47 X ||| Via Web Browser Q 1 Review this week's assigned reading and resources to prepare for this discussion. • Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity o Introduction, "The

Fork in the RESPOND Road" Chapter 1, "The Question of Necessity: Athens and Jerusalem" Chapter 2, "Allies or Enemies? Historical Views on Faith and Science" distinction between Christian and ecular thinking is described in Chapter 1 of the Entwistle text. In addition, Entwistle provides examples in chapter 1 regarding how both Christian and secular thinking can be done well and poorly. Using your own examples and experiences, address each of the following: O 2:48 X ||| Via Web Browser a • Using your own examples and experiences, address each of the following: 1 o Christian way of thinking that is done well. Describe with examples what makes it well. o Christian way of thinking done poorly. Elaborate what made it poorly. o What type of secular thinking is done well? Provide examples. quirements • Initial posts: • How can secular thinking be done poorly? Provide examples. DISCUSS ○ Citation Requirements: minimum of 1 industry authoritative or scholarly source • APA Formatting o Word Count: 150-200 wo O Г