72to save steel handling costs an alternative design is proposed for t
7.2.To save steel-handling costs, an alternative design is proposed for the beam in Problem 7.1, using two No. 9 (No. 29) Grade 80 bars to provide approximately the same steel strength as the originally proposed four No. 7 (No. 22)Grade 60 bars. Check to determine if the redesigned beam is satisfactory with respect to cracking according to the ACI Code. What modification could you suggest that would minimize the number of bars to reduce cost, yet satisfy requirements of crack control?
*The amount will be in form of wallet points that you can redeem to pay upto 10% of the price for any assignment. **Use of solution provided by us for unfair practice like cheating will result in action from our end which may include permanent termination of the defaulter’s account.Disclaimer:The website contains certain images which are not owned by the company/ website. Such images are used for indicative purposes only and is a third-party content. All credits go to its rightful owner including its copyright owner. It is also clarified that the use of any photograph on the website including the use of any photograph of any educational institute/ university is not intended to suggest any association, relationship, or sponsorship whatsoever between the company and the said educational institute/ university. Any such use is for representative purposes only and all intellectual property rights belong to the respective owners.