debate and argues for a solution that will satisfy both sides. Given the two articles linked below that
present opposing sides of an issue (mandatory uniforms in schools), construct your own 2-3 page
Rogerian argument essay in which you attempt to arrive at a workable solution or "middle ground."
Article 1: "School Dress Codes and Uniform Policies"
Article 2: "Dressing Diversity: Politics of Difference and the Case of School Uniforms"
1. How does the Rogerian model of argument help you better understand the topic that's being
discussed? Why is it a good practice to acknowledge both sides of the argument? (3-4 sentences)
2. Will you use the Rogerian Approach in your own argumentative essay? Why or why not? (2-3
sentences)