Bio. 321 Results and Discussion Grading Guidelines (Note: we reserve the right to modify this as necessary) Section Results Aspect Graded Possible Points Adequate text description (clear, succinct) Inclusion of appropriate figures and tables Neatness/readability/style of figs and tabs 10 Correct execution of analyses Quality Score* 5589 10 5 Discussion Organization/clarity of discussion 10 10 Consideration and discussion of objectives 10 Relationship of work to that of others 10 Logic of interpretations/presentation of alternatives 10 Other Presentation of overall conclusions Adequate/appropriate citation of original literature Quality Score* English - spelling, grammar, sentence structure, overall clarity and succinctness 10 110 15 15 5 Total - 100 *Quality Score – Each section has a ‘quality score' that rates the success of the writer at accomplishing the goals of that section in good scientific prose. The editor has the discretion to make quality judgements here that fall outside the stated categories. COMMENTS: