the answers weaken her argument?
Holiday concludes by acknowledging a debt that she owes, but she
admits that she "doesn't have all the answers." Does that lack of
certainty or incompleteness weaken her argument? Strengthen it?
Why or why not? Should she have proposed a concrete action of
some kind, any kind, for her readers to take? Was it sufficiently
powerful and persuasive to simply assert that she owes a debt to her
own children and to the country in general? Consider the relationship
that Holiday builds with the audience. How are her style and the
content of her confessions rhetorical choices? Do they succeed?
https://www.theplayerstribune.com/articles/lauren-jrue-holiday-nba-
racial-injustice