In a paper of roughly
you are to track down a political advertisement guilty of underhanded
techniques in its partisan electoral pitch (you may choose print or video as you prefer) and explain what
nefarious tactics it employs to sell its product. Your goal is to expose the misdeeds of the advertisement:
in what sense is the ad "wrong" in its presentation of its subject matter, and how would an educated
audience refute its claims?
Your analysis should certainly include an analysis of logical fallacies used in the ad. As we have discussed
in class, however, there's lots of other ways political ads mislead us, as well. Thus, you'll also want to
explore the "visual reading" tactics we've examined in this week of the course. That is, you should
examine not only how the ad twists logic to sell an idea or candidate, but also how it carefully crafts
visual imagery to sell that electoral product. (We will practice combining these techniques in class as the
deadline approaches.)
For this first assignment, I'm asking you to perform only a small amount of research. In this case, you'll
be doing "primary" research - that is, you'll be exploring the internet to find the ad you'll be writing
about. (That's distinct from "secondary" research - in which you find sources that are studying the same
thing you are. The research you will undertake on future essays in the class will be "secondary" research.)
As you go out and find the ad you'll write about, remember that you should select carefully: your papers
will go much better if you find ads that offer a wealth of logical and visual trickery to expose. Not all ads
do (even the political ones).
Fig: 1