Question

Please review the Oklahoma Supreme Court decision available at: https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/oklahoma-supreme- opioids.pdf The same case is also available at: https://law.justia.com/cases/oklahoma/supreme- court/2021/118474.html From the Johnson & Johnson opinion, please very briefly discuss

the facts and background of the case. How is public nuisance defined in Oklahoma? What happened to the other co- defendants? According to the Oklahoma Supreme Court, what would have been a better tort claim? From our textbook or lectures, what is the definition of that other, better tort? What did the Oklahoma Supreme court rule, and why did the Oklahoma Supreme Court rule the way it did?