Search for question
Question

The explanation logically discusses why both the end result and nature of change identified in

part C would be appropriate for the company in the scenario using Balogun and Hope-Hailey's

model.

D:ACTION RESEARCH MODEL

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of 4 steps of the action research model is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion of 4 steps of the action research model does not logically describe how each

step could be applied to the change process for the company in the scenario.

COMPETENT

The discussion accurately identifies 4 steps of the action research model and logically describes

how each step could be applied to the change process for the company in the scenario.

E:INNOVATION STRATEGIES

NOT EVIDENT

The 2 recommended innovation strategies are not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The 2 innovation strategies recommended includes one or more innovation strategies that are

illogical or inappropriate for transitioning the company in the scenario from a traditional

organization to a learning organization.

COMPETENT

The 2 innovation strategies recommended for management are logical and appropriate for

transitioning the company in the scenario from a traditional organization to a learning

organization.

E1:EXPLANATION OF INNOVATION STRATEGIES

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of how an innovation strategy could be used in the company's change process is

not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE/nThe discussion of 4 steps of Kotter's 8-step model does not logically describe how each step

could be applied to the change process for the company in the scenario.

COMPETENT

The discussion accurately identifies 4 steps of Kotter's 8-step model and logically describes how

each step could be applied to the change process for the company in the scenario.

G:FIVE PILLARS OF SUSTAINABLE CHANGE

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of how the five pillars of sustainable change could be used to sustain the

company's learning organization environment is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation does not logically discuss how each of the five pillars of sustainable change

could be applied to sustain the learning organization environment of the company in the

scenario.

COMPETENT

The explanation logically discusses how each of the five pillars of sustainable change could be

applied to sustain the learning organization environment of the company in the scenario.

H:SOURCES

NOT EVIDENT

The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are

quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or

summarized and a reference list; however, the citations or reference list is incomplete or

inaccurate.

Fig: 1

Fig: 2