1-1 Discussion: Introduction Initial Post cyb 220 Directions First, introduce yourself to the class. Include your major and anything you would like to share about yourself. Then address the prompt

below. Before you begin this discussion, review the article A Definition of Systems Thinking: A Systems Approach. Then, in your initial post, introduce yourself briefly and provide an example of systems thinking in the world outside of computer networking. Also describe how systems thinking applies to network security. Rubic Directions Undergraduate Discussion Rubric Overview Your active participation in the discussions is essential to your overall success this term. Discussion questions will help you make meaningful connections between the course content and the larger concepts of the course. These discussions give you a chance to express your own thoughts, ask questions, and gain insight from your peers and instructor. Directions For each discussion, you must create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts. For your initial post, do the following: Write a post of 1 to 2 paragraphs. ● Consider content from other parts of the course where appropriate. Use proper citation methods for your discipline when referencing scholarly or popular sources. Criteria Comprehension Timeliness Engagement Writing (Mechanics) Discussion Rubric Proficient Exemplary Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail (100%) N/A Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail (100%) Writes posts that are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations (100%) Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using adequate organization and detail (85%) Needs Improvement Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail (55%) Submits initial post on time Submits initial post one day (100%) late (55%) Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (85%) Provides somewhat relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (55%) Writes posts that are easily | Writes posts that are understood using proper citation methods where applicable with few errors in citations (85%) understandable using proper citation methods where applicable with a number of errors in citations (55%) Not Evident Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea (0%) Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail (0%) Writes posts that others are not able to understanc and does not use proper citation methods where applicable (0%) Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Total