Researchers used a questionnaire to find out from 500 students whether they preferred
carrying out cognitive activities in the morning or in the evening. The students who preferred
mornings were called 'Larks' and those who preferred evenings were called 'Owls'. Students
found to have no preference were called 'In Betweens'. The results of the questionnaire
found 315 'Owls', 53 'Larks' and 132 'In Betweens'.
The researchers wanted to test whether 'Larks' were better at cognitive activities in the
morning and 'Owls' better in the evening, as predicted from the preferences.
Using the 368 students who were 'Larks' or 'Owls', the researchers asked them to perform
cognitive activities in controlled conditions. There were two types of cognitive activity: one
tested creativity and the other tested analysis skills. Each type of activity had 20 cognitive
tasks for the students to complete.
Each student had to complete all 40 cognitive tasks twice on one day, between 9am and
10am in the morning, then again between 3pm and 4pm in the afternoon. The scores
indicate the number of tasks in each type of cognitive activity that the students performed
correctly.
Table 1 shows the mean number of tasks out of 40 that were correct.
'Larks'
'Owls'
Totals
9am to 10am
Creative
10
8
18
Analysis
15
12
27
Total
25
20
45
3pm to 4pm
Creative
Table 1
6
12
18
Analysis
14
15
29
Total
20
27
47
Overall
total
45
47
92
(Source: Adapted from Roberts and Kyllonen (1999))/nStatistical research
a) Analyse the data provided in Table 1 to explain three conclusions that the
researchers might draw from these results./nTable 2 shows the mean number of tasks out of 40 that were correct for 'Larks' and
'Owls' in the morning.
'Larks'
'Owls'
Totals
9am to 10am
Creative
10
8
18
Analysis
15
Page 7
12
27
Total
25
20
45
Table 2
b) Analyse the data provided in Table 2 to explain whether the results are likely to
show a significant difference. You do not need to perform a hypothesis test.
The total word limit for question 3 is 300 words. This does not include calculations.
Fig: 1
Fig: 2
Fig: 3