5 30 24 6 54 am his 200 writing plan progress check 3 guidelines and r
Search for question
Question
5/30/24, 6:54 AM
HIS 200 Writing Plan Progress Check 3 Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Assignment Information
your
later
Throughout Modules Three and Four, you have continued to work on your Project 1: Writing Plan assignment, which you will formally submit for completion at the end of Module Four of the course.
This progress check assignment provides you with an important opportunity to get valuable instructor feedback on the progress you are making and to ensure you are on the right track for
submission.
Prompt
Module Three: Communicating Historical Ideas has considered how historians communicate their message to a specific audience. Return to your submission for Progress Check 2 and identify an
audience that would be interested in your event and an answer to your historical research question. Keep that audience in mind as you write your initial thesis statement as part of this assignment. You
will also describe primary and secondary sources you could use to research your historical event.
Specifically, in this assignment, you will submit the following elements of your Project 1: Writing Plan for review by your instructor:
In Module Three: Communicating Historical Ideas, Learning Block 3-4 (page 2) in the webtext, you completed the following element:
I. Describe the historical event that you selected. Why is this event significant?
II. Describe at least two secondary sources that you could use to research your historical event. Your sources must be relevant to your event and must be of an appropriate academic nature. In your
description, consider questions such as: What are the similarities and differences in the content of your sources? What makes them appropriate and relevant for investigating your event? What
was your thought process when you were searching for sources? How did you make choices?
III. Describe at least two primary sources that you could use to research your historical event. Your sources must be relevant to your event and must be of an appropriate academic nature. In your
description, consider questions such as: How do these sources relate to your secondary sources? What do they add to your understanding of the event? What makes them appropriate and
relevant for investigating your event?
In Module Three: Communicating Historical Ideas, Learning Block 3-4 (page 3) in the webtext, you worked toward the following element:
IV. Based on your review of primary and secondary sources, develop a research question related to the historical event you selected. In other words, what would you like to know more about?
V. Create a thesis statement based on your research question. Your thesis should be clear, specific, and arguable, and state a claim about your historical event. As you create your thesis, keep in
mind an audience that would be interested in your historical event and research question.
Please note that many of the elements within this assignment directly align to elements in the Project 1 Guidelines and Rubric. You will need to add finishing touches to this progress check submission
to prepare your final writing plan for submission in Module Four.
What to Submit
The Writing Plan Progress Check 3 must be submitted as a 1-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Follow the formatting of the
example included in Module Three: Communicating Historical Ideas, learning block 3-4 (page 3) in the webtext and include identifying information (name, course code and title, assignment title,
name of university, and date) as well as section headings (preliminary writing plan, sources, thesis statement) as appropriate.
Criteria
Historical Event
Secondary Sources
Writing Plan Progress Check 3 Rubric
Proficient (100%)
Describes selected historical event and its
significance
Describes at least two relevant and
appropriate secondary sources that could
be used to research the historical event
Needs Improvement (75%)
Describes selected historical event and its
significance, but with gaps in detail or
clarity
Describes at least two secondary sources
that could be used to research the historical
event, but with gaps in appropriateness,
relevance, or detail
Not Evident (0%)
Value
Does not describe selected historical event
and its significance
5
Does not describe at least two secondary
sources that could be used to research the
historical event
20
file:///C:/Users/Atul/AppData/Local/Temp/Rar$EX00.536/rubrics/Writing Plan Progress Check 3 Guidelines and Rubric.html
12
1/2 5/30/24, 6:54 AM
Criteria
Primary Sources
Research Question
Thesis
Articulation of Response
Proficient (100%)
Describes at least two relevant and
appropriate primary sources that could be
used to research the historical event
Develops research question related to the
selected historical event based on review of
primary and secondary sources
Develops a thesis statement related to the
research question
Submission has no major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization
Assignment Information
Needs Improvement (75%)
Describes at least two primary sources that
could be used to research the historical
event, but with gaps in appropriateness,
relevance, or detail
Develops research question related to the
selected historical event, but question is
not based on review of primary and
secondary sources
Develops a thesis statement, but thesis is
not related to the research question
Submission has major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization that negatively impact
readability and articulation of main ideas
Not Evident (0%)
Value
Does not describe at least two primary
sources that could be used to research the
historical event
20
Does not develop research question related
to the selected historical event
20
Does not develop a thesis statement
Submission has critical errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization that prevent understanding of
ideas
25
10
Total:
100%
2/2
file:///C:/Users/Atul/AppData/Local/Temp/Rar$EX00.536/rubrics/Writing Plan Progress Check 3 Guidelines and Rubric.html/n Module Three: Communicating Historical Ideas | Learning Block 3-4:
Thesis Statements
In your historical analysis essay, you will not only be asking a research
question, but you will attempt to answer it and argue your position with the
help of historical evidence.
Your thesis statement will provide an outline for your argument, and it will
work as a guide for anyone reading your essay. Your thesis statement
should be clear, specific, arguable, and defensible from the sources that
you have available to use in your research. It will give direction to the rest
of your essay. The more practice you have creating thesis statements, the
better you will be at forming coherent arguments in your writing. This is a
crucial component of communicating historical ideas.
You will practice writing sample thesis statements as well your thesis
statement in this learning block. Although you will submit a working thesis
to your instructor for feedback, you will have the opportunity to revise your
thesis before submitting the final draft of your historical analysis essay in
Module Eight, Learning Block 8-4.
Learning Objectives
In this learning block, you will:
Explore the relationship between your research question and your thesis
statement
Practice crafting thesis statements
Discuss your thesis statement with your classmates
Submit your working thesis statement and choice of sources to your
instructor for approval What to Submit
The Writing Plan Progress Check 3 must be submitted as a 1-page
Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New
Roman font, and one-inch margins. Follow the formatting of the example
included in Module Three: Communicating Historical Ideas, learning block
3-4 (page 3) in the webtext and include identifying information (name,
course code and title, assignment title, name of university, and date) as
well as section headings (preliminary writing plan, sources, thesis
statement) as appropriate.