Question
Assignment: Thesis-Driven Essay 900-1100 words The Thesis-Driven Essay represents 24% of the final grade and includes the following LOs: #thesis, #organisation, #evidencebased, #composition, #sourcequality, #professionalism. For this assignment, you must individually write a well-supported, well-organised, thesis-driven argumentative essay (between 900-1100 words) exploring the complexities of personal identity. The Thesis-Driven Essay can focus on one specific aspect of personal identity and demonstrate how it is more complex than it initially appears, or it can take a broader view and look at personal identity in general and why it is complex. For example, possible areas of focus may include academic identity, national identity, religious identity, gender identity, generational identity, hobbies, family relationships, psychological identity, political identity, etc. To strengthen your argument, incorporate at least one example from your life and consider multiple perspectives. While you can draw upon your experiences or family, you must maintain a persuasive stance throughout the whole essay. The essay must also include at least five credible sources, which must be cited and referenced per the APA Style. Dos and Don'ts Dos: ● ● ● ● ● Do make complex, quality claims, bringing in evidence from your own background (or case studies). Do prepare an outline and a reverse outline, keeping the principles of #organisation in mind. Do proofread and revise (as many times as necessary). Do hand in the following parts of the assignment in one single document to get the full score (see template): 1. Thesis with rationale 2. Annotated bibliography 3. The complete essay in APA with references ● Do try to include at least one academic article in your research. Do include an annotated bibliography. Do format the entire document in APA style. This template may be used as a guidance for the Thesis-Driven Essay: Download the template and save it to your computer. When complete, save it as a PDF and submit to Forum. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OHLVyk6m6Zonc- JkiGaWmvct BLAIxJbA9mzdXs8Pmw/edit?usp=sharing Don'ts ● ● Footnote Requirement Add footnotes to draw attention to your most prominent applications of LOs (especially those mentioned in the LOs to be graded: #thesis, #organization, #evidencebased, #composition, #sourcequality, #professionalism. In the footnote text (at the bottom of the page), provide the hashtag of the LO and a brief explanation (at least 2-3-sentences) of your application. Help the professor understand precisely why this constitutes a robust application. Remember that the use of #thesis should be within the paper itself; the footnote is merely there to show how you believe you applied it well in the text. For each LO, footnote what you believe your strongest application of the LO is. ● ● ● ● Do not quote big chunks of text. Instead, paraphrase arguments. Quote minimally. Do not collaborate and do not share your essay electronically with others. This is an individual assignment. It does not matter if other students are from your country, your family and experiences are unique. You can discuss the project with others and ask for feedback, but you must write your own essay. a strong application. For samples of effective annotations, refer to the footnotes that go along with each LO example written in square brackets. Using APA7 Conventions for Formatting an Annotated Bibliography The text and the reference list should be double-spaced. Use Times New Roman, size 12. Each paragraph should be indented. Reference list entries must have a hanging indent. References should be organised alphabetically. Assignment Information ● Do not abuse ChatGPT and other AI tools. Instead, use AI tools critically and responsibly and follow your instructor's guidelines (e.g., footnotes). Do not plagiarise. Use legitimate sources and cite them properly. Do not fail to hand in the different components of the assignment. Revise your work before the submission to avoid unnecessary penalisations. Do not start at the last minute. ● Footnote text does not count towards the target length of the assignment. Including footnotes is an important part of reflecting on your learning. It should be an occasion for #professionalism. Help the professor understand exactly why this constitutes Length: 900-1100 words. Please indicate the word count (not including footnotes or references) at the end of the body of your essay. Weight: 24% Learning Outcomes Added ● ● Composition: Communicate with a clear and precise style. Effective communication requires a clear and precise style that reflects the voice of the communicator and that is appropriate for the intended audience. Communicators should use the fewest words necessary (they should respect the principle of “parsimony”) and should select words carefully to be as clear as possible and to facilitate transitions from one idea to the next. Avoid passive voice, stilted diction, elaborate structure, and imprecision; write and speak simply, directly, and sincerely. Understand when to use paraphrase, quotation, or summary to incorporate necessary information smoothly into your communication. Thesis: Write a clear declarative sentence that takes a firm position on the topic under consideration and serves to organize the rest of the work. Written and spoken communications that are intended to convey a message should present a clear, well-defined central claim. Thesis statements should be substantial, precise, arguable, relevant, and concise. This overarching message should serve as the organizing principle of the communication. Organization: Effectively organize communications. A written, spoken, or visual communication should be organized in a way that will be easy for the intended audience to understand and remember. The organization should reflect the purpose of the document or presentation, and accentuate what is most important. EvidenceBased: Identify and appropriately structure the information needed to support an argument effectively. A written or spoken communication that is intended to make a specific point should clearly present relevant and persuasive evidence. Doing this well is a two-step process. First, one must identify the evidence relevant to supporting the conclusion. The argument must be formulated to be consistent with the supporting evidence and should address apparent contradictions. Second, one must arrange evidence effectively. This means anticipating where one's audience will notice a need for evidence, determining how much evidence will be needed given the strength of the conclusion, and deciding on how best to present the evidence (e.g., as a set of claims, a figure, a quote, or a paraphrase). In all cases, written and ken, evidence should support underlying assumptions and show that implications of the argument are consistent with established facts and principles. SourceQuality: Distinguish between categories and types of information to determine source quality. Sources can be categorized and ordered in terms of their relevance, currency, accuracy, authority, and purpose. One should be able to check how information is vetted and verified, and whether there is a means to correct errors. Based on these criteria, one ● should be able to assign different types of information to hierarchies of source quality for the purposes of one's work. Professionalism: Ensure that your communication follows established guidelines and use a careful editing process. Part of effective communication involves presenting yourself and your work in an appropriate and professional manner. To communicate effectively, consider the norms for presenting yourself to others, including tone, forms of address, and the use of slang or informal speech. Always proofread written work for errors, properly attribute quotations, ideas, data and other sources, and follow conventional practices regarding attribution and formatting for the type of communication you are crafting. Different academic disciplines have different formatting conventions, and it is important to use the expected standards. More broadly, ensure that your approach to communication, whether verbal or written, meets or surpasses the expectations relevant to the context. ● ●