D Question 1

D Question 1 The Bureau of Indian Affairs tells tribes who can and cannot become tribal members/citizens. True O False 1 Q 2 W 3 E 4 R 5 T Exit 8 pts 6 Y 7 At 50 D Question 2 O political Native Americans and Alaska Natives are eligible for certain reserved rights or hiring status of tribal nations in the preferences because of the inherently sovereign United States. O cultural racial none of these ! 1 2 3 4 % 5 Exit 8 pts 6 7 D Question 3 Unrecognized tribes do not have inherent tribal sovereignty. True O False 1 2 3 4 % 5 8 pts 6 7 D Question 4 There is no opposition to the Federal Acknowledgment Process and everyone believes it is fair and equitable. O True O False 1 2 3 4 % 5 Exit 8 pts 6 D Question 5 Unrecognized tribes only want federal recognition to open casinos. True False 1 @ 2 3 11 4 Not s % 5 Exit 8 pts 6 7

Read the article, "Congressional leaders push for oversight of judiciary," from Daily Record. Link:- https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=ITBC&u=uphoenix&id=GALE| A250423897&v=2.1&it=r&sid=ebsco&asid=165d8d13&backToS ource=true

Write a 200-250-word introductory paragraph, including a thesis statement, for an essay that responds to the question below. Please note that you do not need to write the whole essay. Does it matter that young people don't vote as much as older people? Why or why not?

1. The author distinguishes between situations that are de jure and those that are de facto. What, according to the author, is the difference between those situations and why is that difference important? Be sure to use your own words and not those of the author. 2) Thinking about the author's argument across pages VIII-XI, why and how did the 1968 passage of the Fair Housing Act sidetrack our society's efforts to remedy housing segregation? Be sure to use your own words and not those of the author. 3) What, according to the author, is the "de facto segregation myth" and, more importantly, why is that myth so destructive (again, according to the author)? Be sure to use your own words and not those of the author. 4) How does (again, according to the author) a 1974 Supreme Court case from Detroit capture the dangers of the "de facto segregation myth"? 5) The author argues he agrees with the Chief Justice Robert's theory but not his facts. What theory by Roberts does the author agree with and why (according to the author) is it so 6) How do the events described in section "II" of the chapter illustrate the author's argument about the dangers of the "de facto segregation myth" (see question 3 above)? 7) How does the Baltimore ordinance discussed in the chapter illustrate the author's argument about the dangers of the "de facto segregation myth" (see question 3 above)? 8) What was Buchanan and provide two examples of how local governments evade it being sure to explain how and why they did so. (sidenote: like film and book titles, court cases are usually placed in italics) 9) What is single-family zoning and, according to the author, how could single-family zoning intentionally lead to segregation? 10) How, according to the author, did zoning regulations damage even existing predominantly black neighborhoods? Pay special attention to the zoning of certain types of industry and entertainment.

This conversation will have us examine controversial election law issues in Texas and how they relate to the institutions of state government that have shaped them. What's happening with the governor, the legislature, and the courts? Texas voting laws have long been some of the most restrictive in the country. Is Texas building on that illiberal foundation that started after the 2020 presidential election and damages confidence in state institutions? Or is there evidence of widespread fraud or voting illegalities occurring at polling places around the state? This Convo relates to the course content in Weeks 2 & 3, specifically: the separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government and how each branch was involved in voting law changes, how the judicial selection process could compromise the independence of judges, the varying motivations of a part-time legislature with part-time reps and senators, and Texas's long civil rights history. I have linked you to two recent articles put out by the Brennan Center for Justice, an independent, nonpartisan organization that "works to build an America that is democratic, just, and free -- for all." They take a particularly critical view of recent election law changes in Texas. The questions before us is why Texas would be so blatant in enacting voter/voting restrictions and what this means for the upcoming midterm elections this year and the 2024 election. I'd like y'all to dig around and see what you can find out (from reputable sources) about claims of election fraud justifying voting restrictions in Texas. Also, think about some of the questions asked above as you prepare your thoughts to add to this conversation. Remember, it is a conversation! You may ask and answer questions, you may add your analysis by considering what you've learned from the Brennan Center articles and the operation of the branches of government in Texas. Show me that you can link and evaluate information, and be sure to post often. I'll join as well. link to articles: -https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/dont-mess-texas-voters -https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/records-show-massive- disenfranchisement-and-racial-disparities-2022-texas

Our understanding of citizenship, that is, a person’s membership in an organized political community, is being challenged by a number of forces including, as discussed in class materials, a Western culture that gives priority to individual rights over collective responsibility, the emergence of multiculturalism and the politics of identity, and the effects of globalization. With respect to each, describe in what ways these forces call into question our traditional understandings of citizenship. Are these challenges good for democracy and for our political community?

1) Several major IR theories have largely neglected the importance of culture, race and religion in international relations. Yet, there has been a resurgence of interest recently in these topics. Explain how cultural, racial and religious dynamics have been used to explain developments in world politics and highlight any potential problems or dangers you see with these approaches. 2) Explain why Christopher Layne believes that "Over the next two decades, international politics will be shaped by whether the international system remains unipolar or becomes multipolar." Why is this question so important? What do the various readings Layne reviews and some of the other material we covered in class suggest we should expect to see here? 3) Individual leaders are often presumed to be rational decision-makers. Yet, as Drezner puts it, "human beings cannot be reduced to bloodless calculating machines, despite the assumptions of rational choice theorists. All individuals have fears, foibles, and failings that cause behavior to deviate from how a dispassionate, rational decision maker would behave." Describe and explain at least four of the information processing mechanisms or psychological dynamics that have been identified which affect how individual leaders make foreign policy decisions and indicate how they do or do not suggest deviations from rational behavior. 4) Describe and explain what non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are. Summarize and explain Richard Price's arguments on the role that NGOs and transnational civil society played in the campaign to ban anti-personnel landmines. What does this suggest to Price about the relative influence that NGOs do or do not have on international relations? Assess the significance of and limits to the impact of NGOs on international relations and indicate whether you share Price's assessment in this regard. 5) Using either current or historical examples, identify and explain the various ways in which states conduct international relations or the various tools available to them in pursuing their foreign policy goals and interests. 6) Individuals remain peripheral or insignificant actors in international relations. Agree or disagree and explain why.

Our understanding of citizenship, that is, a person’s membership in an organized political community, is being challenged by a number of forces including, as discussed in class materials, a Western culture that gives priority to individual rights over collective responsibility, the emergence of multiculturalism and the politics of identity, and the effects of globalization. With respect to each, describe in what ways these forces call into question our traditional understandings of citizenship. Are these challenges good for democracy and for our political community?

We have a week to learn about Operation Lone Star, a border wall and security initiative launched by Texas Governor Abbott in March 2021 to address what he called the failure of the Biden administration to secure the southern border. Over the past 19 months, Operation Lone Star has sent more than 10,000 Texas National Guard members, many who left their families and jobs with little notice, for months-long service. Our first Public Journal entry will assess the background information about Texas Governor Greg Abbott's border wall and security initiatives. In reviewing the Texas Tribune article, keep your eyes open for references to the different levels of government (federal, state, and local) and among the local levels, the counties, and the cities.

“The worldwide transition from traditional to legal authority is the single most important political event of our times and furnishes the context within which everything else takes place” (from e-text - Selected Readings for Political Studies 100). Explain what this quote means with reference to the transformative power of liberalism (as an expression of legal authority) upon Western political culture. Be sure to explain the difference between traditional and legal authority in your answer. On what grounds is legal authority seen to be superior?