In response to your peers, review their initial posts. Then, compare and contrast the reasoning behind your decision with the reasoning behind the decisions of your peers. For your response

posts, do the following: Reply to at least two classmates outside of your own initial post thread. • In Module One, complete your two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern. ● • In Modules Two through Eight, complete your two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone. ● 8-1 Response Directions CYB 210 ● Demonstrate more depth and thought than saying things like "I agree" or "You are wrong." Guidance is provided for you in the discussion prompt. Criteria Comprehension Discussion Rubric Proficient Exemplary Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail (100%) Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using adequate organization and detail (85%) Needs Improvement Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail (55%) Not Evident Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea (0%) Criteria Timeliness Engagement Writing (Mechanics) Andrew Rackliffe Hello class, N/A Exemplary Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail (100%) Writes posts that are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations (100%) Needs Improvement Submits initial post on time Submits initial post one day (100%) late (55%) Proficient Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (85%) Provides somewhat relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (55%) Writes posts that are easily | Writes posts that are understood using proper citation methods where applicable with few errors in citations (85%) 1st Response understandable using proper citation methods where applicable with a number of errors in citations (55%) Not Evident Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail (0%) Writes posts that others are not able to understand and does not use proper citation methods where applicable (0%) I do not know much about IPv6 outside of this course as before my degree here at SNHU, I did not know that it even existed. But I am beginning to understand why there is a need for more places and people to switch to IPv6 from 4. IPv4 has too little IPs left to give to people, and it will run out one day soon. Businesses and ordinary people must update to the IPv6 in a timely but cautious manner. While we do not have to worry about IPs with the new version, (practically unlimited Total number) we do have to deal with all the known and potential security issues that will come with this. While I believe that IPv6 is pretty secure in conjunction with other network security devices and such, it should be noted that IPv6 is a newer technology and since it has been slow to implement across the internet, there may be tens or hundreds of security related issues or vulnerabilities we do not know of. As the technology is widely implemented and more people become accustomed to the new IP, these issues will be found and fixed in due time. I believe since IPv6 has forced manufactures to support IPSec that this newer version can become even more secure than IPv4. 8-1 Discussion: IPv6 Integration Russell Hawkins 2nd response Eventually IPv6 will be implemented across the internet. So, it is best for us to go ahead and learn the protocols associated with it. That being said, for right now, I do not think IPv6 is necessary for most businesses to use. My workplace is responsible for roughly 250 locations with an average of 50 devices each. Each one of these locations has a public IP assigned by the ISP. We set the internal IPs as the same for each location. For example: Staff computers are VLAN 1 - 10.10.1.0/24 for staff and VLAN 10-10.10.10.0/24 for the public. With this there is no need for additional numbering. For companies that are much larger I could possibly see wanting more variety in the numbering, but using VLANs really negates the problem in my opinion. I do not think there are any greater security concerns using IPv6 than IPv4. Training will be key when introducing IPv6. Because the security protocols will be similar, they will not be exactly the same therefore there will be a learning curve that will need adequate training.