Initial Post: Apa format, 1.5 spacing Response Posts: The Wikipedia logo consisting of a globe constructed out of puzzle pieces with different letters on them. In this team discussion, you gain a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of Wikipedia as an information source by discussing some of the Wikipedia controversies linked in Lesson 7 of the module notes. Step 1: Browse this list of Wikipedia Controversies Links to an external site. and select one to learn more about. Step 2: In an initial post of at least 100 words, answer the following questions:: Which controversy did you select? Provide a 2-3 sentence summary. Could this controversy have been avoided if Wikipedia followed the process used by peer-reviewed academic sources? If so, how? If not, why not? What lessons can we draw from this controversy that will help us to become better researchers? Step 3: Reply to the posts of at least two of your team members. In your replies, compare and contrast the controversies they selected with the one you researched. You should also comment on the lessons we can draw from the controversies that your teammates posted. Chose any topic from this link : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List of Wikipedia controversies Note : no need of response post (step 3) for now