Money banking and financial markets group presentation Does the emergence of fintech mean we no longer need banks? The emergence of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies does not necessarily mean that we no longer need banks. While cryptocurrencies offer some alternatives to traditional banking systems, they do not completely replace the functions that banks provide in the economy. Here are a few reasons why: Regulatory Compliance: Banks play a crucial role in ensuring regulatory compliance, such as anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) regulations. Cryptocurrencies operate in a less regulated environment, which can lead to concerns about illicit activities and consumer protection. Financial Services: Banks offer a wide range of financial services beyond just storing and transferring money. These include lending, investment services, financial advice, and more. While some of these services can be replicated in the cryptocurrency space, the infrastructure is still developing, and traditional banks have a long-standing presence and expertise in these areas. Stability and Trust: Banks provide stability and trust to the financial system. They are backed by government regulations, and deposit insurance, and often have long histories of serving their customers. Cryptocurrencies, on the other hand, are subject to volatility and are not backed by any centralized authority, which can make them less reliable for certain financial needs. Integration with Traditional Financial System: Despite the growth of cryptocurrencies, the traditional financial system remains dominant in many aspects of the economy. Banks facilitate transactions between fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies, and many cryptocurrency exchanges rely on banking services for their operations. Consumer Convenience: For many people, banks offer convenience through services like ATMs, credit/debit cards, and online banking platforms. While the cryptocurrency ecosystem is evolving and becoming more user-friendly, it has not yet reached the level of convenience and accessibility provided by traditional banks. In summary, while cryptocurrencies offer alternatives to traditional banking systems and have the potential to disrupt certain aspects of the financial industry, banks still play a vital role in the economy and are unlikely to be replaced entirely by cryptocurrencies in the near future. Instead, it's more likely that we'll see a coexistence and integration of both traditional banking and cryptocurrency systems. Arguments For: Romeo Decentralization: Cryptocurrencies operate on decentralized networks, eliminating the need for centralized intermediaries like banks. This decentralization reduces the risk of manipulation and censorship, providing individuals with more control over their finances. Abdulla Financial Inclusion: Cryptocurrencies can provide financial services to the unbanked and underbanked populations who lack access to traditional banking services. With just an internet connection, anyone can participate in the cryptocurrency economy, opening up financial opportunities for millions around the world. Abdulla Lower Fees: Cryptocurrency transactions often come with lower fees compared to traditional banking services, especially for international transfers. This can result in cost savings for individuals and businesses, particularly in regions where banking fees are high. Bartu Security and Transparency: Blockchain technology, which underpins cryptocurrencies, offers enhanced security and transparency compared to traditional banking systems. Transactions are recorded on a public ledger, making them immutable and resistant to fraud. This reduces the need for trust in third-party institutions. Innovation and Disruption: The emergence of cryptocurrencies has sparked innovation in the financial sector, leading to the development of new technologies and financial products. This competition can drive banks to improve their services and adapt to the changing needs of consumers in a digital age. Arguments Against: Abdulla Regulatory Uncertainty: The regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies is constantly evolving and often uncertain. Without clear regulations, cryptocurrencies may struggle to gain widespread acceptance and integration into the existing financial system. Romeo Volatility and Risk: Cryptocurrencies are known for their extreme price volatility, which can pose risks to investors and consumers. This volatility undermines their utility as a stable store of value and medium of exchange, which are essential functions of traditional banks. Abdulla Lack of Consumer Protection: Unlike traditional banks, cryptocurrencies lack consumer protection mechanisms such as deposit insurance and dispute resolution services. This leaves users vulnerable to hacks, scams, and loss of funds without recourse. Bartu User Experience and Adoption: Cryptocurrencies still face barriers to mainstream adoption, including complexity for non-technical users, lack of user-friendly interfaces, and limited merchant acceptance. Without widespread adoption, cryptocurrencies may struggle to replace the convenience and familiarity of traditional banking services. Development Arguments/n

Fig: 1