/nArticulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format. Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization. Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas. Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas. 5.5 Total 100%/nInvestigation Meets "Proficient" criteria, and response demonstrates insight into relationship between issue and social scientific thinking. Illustrates how investigation of issue impacted thinking on the issue, supporting response with examples from research investigation. Illustrates how investigation of issue impacted thinking on the issue, but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support. Does not illustrate how investigation of issue impacted thinking on the issue. 13.5. Evidence-Supported Research Meets "Proficient" criteria, and response demonstrates keen insight into impact of evidence supported social science research on personal and professional experiences. Explains why using evidence supported research can give both a personal and professional advantage. Explains why using evidence supported research can give both a personal and professional advantage, but with gaps in clarity or detail. Does not explain why using evidence-supported research can give both a personal and professional advantage. 13.5. Message Meets "Proficient" criteria, and presentation demonstrates understanding of effectively communicating with specific audiences by tailoring message. Communicates message effectively in a way that is tailored to specific audience. Communicates message to audience, but communication is not effective or is not tailored to specific audience Does not communicate message to audience.13.5/nExplains how issue impacts audience, supporting response with examples from research investigation. support. 13.5 Explains how issue impacts audience, but with gaps in clarity, detail, or Does not explain how issue impacts audience. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value. Evidence Meets "Proficient" criteria, and response demonstrates strong understanding of using evidence in drawing conclusions about the impact of contemporary social scientific issues. Describes evidence that supports conclusions about impact of issue on self and audience, supporting response with examples from research investigation. Describes evidence that supports conclusions about impact of issue on self and audience, but with gaps in clarity, detail, or support. Does not describe evidence that supports conclusions about impact of detail. issue on self and audience. 13.5 Personally Meets "Proficient" criteria, and explanation demonstrates keen insight into impact of social sciences on personal experiences Explains why issue is important personally. Explains why issue is important personally, but with gaps in clarity or Does not explain why issue is important personally.13.5./nBe sure to include speaker notes for each slide of your presentation. The speaker notes should help you address the critical elements and should reflect what you would say were you to be giving this presentation. Project Two Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your presentation should have approximately 5-7 PowerPoint slides. Your submission should also include speaker notes that represent what you would say if you were actually giving the presentation. Citations should be formatted according to APA style. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Social Sciences Meets "Proficient" criteria, and response expertly balances necessary detail with brevity. Provides brief overview of how social sciences have previously examined issue and identifies which social science disciplines have previously been used to research issue. Provides brief overview of how social sciences have previously examined issue and identifies which social science disciplines have previously been used to research issue, but with gaps in detail or clarity. Does not provide brief overview of how social sciences have previously examined issue and does not identify which social science disciplines have previously been used to research issue 13.5 Audience Meets "Proficient" criteria, and explanation demonstrates sophisticated understanding of relationship between issue and audience./nI. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. Provide your issue's research question. In a brief overview, how have the social sciences previously examined your selected issue? Include which social science disciplines have previously been used to research or explain your issue. Explain how the issue impacts the audience. In other words, how is the issue relevant to members of the audience? Why should the audience care about the response to your question or the outcome of your investigation? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation. Describe the evidence you have to support your conclusions about the impact of the issue on you personally and on your audience. Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation. Explain why this issue is important to you personally. In other words, why did you select this issue to investigate? V. Illustrate how your investigation of the issue impacted the way you thought about the issue. In other words, how did thinking like a scientist to research and develop a question affect what you thought about the issue you selected? How did social scientific thinking change the lens through which you viewed the issue? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation. Explain why using evidence-supported research can give you both a personal and professional advantage. In other words, what is the value of supporting your work with evidence? Communicate your message in a way that is tailored to your specific audience. For instance, you could consider your vocabulary, your audience's potential current social science knowledge or lack thereof, and what is specifically important to the audience./nSCS-200 applied social sciences 8-1 project two presentation SCS 200 Project Two Guidelines and Rubric Overview Professionals in the social sciences investigate human behavior and society for the purpose of understanding why people act the way they do. This investigation can help address a wide variety of social issues, such as the role of social media in the Arab Spring protests, the impact of social skills on future success, racial factors in police violence, and how partitioned grocery carts can help shoppers purchase healthier foods. Social scientists can help address issues such as these through research and investigation. For the second project in this course, you will build on the work completed in Project One and develop a presentation for the audience you identified in Project One. In your presentation, you will explain how social scientific thinking has affected you and discuss the impact of the issue on your audience, supporting your claims with evidence. Project Two addresses the following course outcomes: ● Illustrate the impact of social scientific thinking on personal and professional experiences • Communicate effectively to specific audiences in examining fundamental aspects of human behavior. Utilize evidence-based approaches in drawing conclusions about the impact of contemporary issues on individuals and society. Prompt In Project Two, you will use the research investigation you wrote for Project One to create a presentation that explains how social scientific thinking has affected you and discusses the impact of your selected issue on your audience. Be sure to include your research question on the first slide of your presentation. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:/nHiring Manager Need to Hire Arises Fill Out Hiring Request Form Submit to Upper Management for Approval Manager Submits Approved Requested Hire Form Get Desired Ad Copy from Hiring Manager Send Job Info to HR Assistant for Job Ad Posting Applicant Received. Suitable Candidate? Begin Interview/ Hiring Process Recruiting Process -Yes Upper Management No Review Application. Application Approved? -No Yes HR Assistant Place Internet Job Ad with Desired Ad Copy and Job Description Responses Received? Forward Received Responses to Hiring Yes- Manager No Wait a Month. Any Responses? No Remove Ad and Inform Manager/nM2 Assignment Due June 18, 2023 Note 1: Show all your work to get credit. Write your solutions clearly and neatly. Note 2: All your answers must be your original work. Cite your sources (if any) properly and include them in a references section at the end. Note 3: Question 1 is worth 20 points and questions 2 and 3 are worth 15 points each. 1. Chapter 8: In your work environment select a process that is dysfunctional. a) Depict the process using a swimlane diagram. Make sure all the steps of the process and the arrows used to show the flow are clearly illustrated in your chart. See Figure 8.4 on page 332 of the textbook for an example. b) Develop a 5w2h framework for the process. Use the questions presented in Table 8.1 on page 336 for the process analysis. c) Discuss opportunities to improve the process. 2. Chapter 9: Find an academic journal article about the use of theory of constraints (TOC) in healthcare. Briefly discuss the important points and findings of the article in your own words and provide your comments (about 300-400 words). Start your discussion by citing the article. 3. Chapter 10: Provide your answer to one of the options below (not both). Option 1: Problem 1 of Chapter 10 on page 440 about weekly scheduling of lab technicians. Clearly define the decision variables and the objective function in your answer and explain the constraints. Excel Solver can be used to solve for the model. Option 2: Chapter 10 discusses three types of scheduling: staff scheduling, job scheduling, and patient appointment scheduling. Provide two examples for any of these types of scheduling from your experience that are inefficient. Discuss the inefficiencies and recommend a scheduling method from the ones discussed in the textbook. Explain how the recommended model could help to improve the inefficiencies you discussed.

Solved: /nArticulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to cit

Home
questions and answers
narticulation of response submission is free of errors related to cita

Question

/nArticulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format. Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization. Submission has major errors related to ci