Project Management Plan for the Gotthard Base Tunnel in Switzerland Page 1 of 47 Context: ● ● ● Tasks: ● Parameters for the Group Assignment ● You are to assume the role of a Developer Project Manager for a proposed construc- tion project. The project can be a residential building, commercial complex, or infra- structure development. You should define the scope of the chosen project clearly; If you do not have a suitable construction project to work on, you can use suitable chapters in Kerzner (2017), e.g. Denver International Airport, to define the project scope; Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: case studies (Fifth). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (NUS Library Copy). You are to develop the PM plan based on the project scope; you can make reasona- ble assumptions whenever necessary; You can use the "Project Management Plan" template at the CDC website: https://www2a.cdc.gov/cdcup/library/templates/default.htm to customise the template according to your needs; You should make the PM plan as detailed as you can; You will also have to develop an 8-10 min video that provides an overview of the PM plan. Submission Requirements: 40% of overall score (10% for video; 30% for PM plan); 4-5 members per team; • You are encouraged ● Under certain circumstances, the lecturer might need to reshuffle students to ensure that all teams have similar number of members; PM plan: No word limit, but succinctness is appreciated (submit as .docx file for checking of word count; e.g. "PM5101 Team 1.docx"); Presentation: submit as .mp4 file (e.g., "PM5101 Team 1.mp4"). Each team submit only ONE word file and ONE presentation (ONE student to submit on behalf of the team; ensure all team members are identified in the submission files); Page 2 of 47 ● Include declaration in pptx and docx: We declare that all material in this assignment is our work and does not involve plagiarism; Criterion Peer review will be conducted after the submission; marks for each student may be adjusted based on peer review. Report Marking Rubrics (30% of course; criteria add up to 100%): Comprehensivene ss and level of detail (30%) Tailoring of PM plan (20%) Authenticity and practicality (20%) Structure (10%) Writing in general, spelling and grammar, formatting (10%) Peer assessment (10%) Criterion Quality of PM Plan (4%) Poor Lack of detail in PM plan; required information are missing Organisation of presentation (2%) Clarity of presentation (2%) Quality of presentation material (2%) No or minimal tailoring of the PM plan when compared to the CDC template The project scope and PM plan are not practical and authentic The plan is disorganized and the information are disjointed Many errors in spelling, grammar, and formatting; unclear and lengthy writing; report is not well-formatted Group mates consistently gave negative feedback Presentation Marking Rubrics (Upon 10%): Poor The PM plan, as presented, did not meet its purpose; seems disjointed and lack needed content Lack clear structure and hard to follow Fair Doesn't help marker understand the PM plan Poorly designed Fair Good *** Good Page 3 of 47 Excellent All required information are provided with comprehensive detail All changes made are suitable and innovative; significant improvements made to provided templates; demonstrates clear understanding of the context and tailored the template accordingly The project scope and PM plan are practical and authentic demonstrating in-depth knowledge of the industry and project management The plan is organized and all sections are integrated Very few errors in spelling, grammar, and formatting; clear and succinct writing; professional looking report and documents Group mates consistently gave positive feedback Excellent The PM plan, as presented, meet its purpose, is well-integrated, and contains the key information needed Structured and easy to follow Helps marker understand the PM plan Professional looking and well designed Plagiarism: All written assignments will have to be submitted via Canvas where Turnitin reports can be generated prior to submission; Turnltln score higher than 20% will be deemed as an indication of plagiarized assign- ment; Plagiarised assignment will not be accepted and will be reported to NUS for discipli- nary actions. Page 4 of 47 Contents Parameters for the Group Assignment.... Table of contents List of figures.......... List of tables List of abbreviations... Chapter 1: Introduction (). 1.1 Overview of the GBT project.. Table of contents 1.1.1 Project Scope 1.1.2 Project Timeline 1.1.3 Significance of the Gotthard Base Tunnel...... 1.2 Purpose and objectives of the Project Management Plan 1.2.1 Purpose.. 1.2.2 Objectives.. 1.3 Identification of key stakeholders....... 1.3.1 Definition of Stakeholders 1.3.2 Key Stakeholders of the GBT. Chapter 2: Project Overview ().............. 2.1 Background information on the project 2.2 Project goals and objectives 2.2.1 Project goals............. 2.2.2 Project objectives........ Chapter 3: Scope management plan () 3.1 Introduction .... 3.2 Scope Definition.... 3.3 Scope Planning. 3.4 Scope Change Control....…....….. 3.5 Scope Verification and Validation. 3.6 Scope Control........ 3.7 Conclusion........ Chapter 4: Schedule management plan () 4.1 Introduction ................ Page 5 of 47 2 .5 8 9 10 11 11 11 12 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 16 16 18 18 19 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 22 22/n. Description Each Chapetr 4 Pages just follow the assignment template Need to Work On The Folllowing Chapters: Chapter 6- Quality management plan Chapter 9 - Risk management plan Chapter 19- Project life cycle description

Fig: 1