The lower court disallowed plaintiff to amends its complaint to add the latest drift incident. Why did the appeals court overturn this decision? O a. Because whereas the lower court

reasoned that adding the latest incident served no purpose because pesticide drift cannot constitute trespass, the appeals court had just reasoned that it could O b. Because the MN Rules of Civil Procedure require that amendments "shall be freely given when justice so requires" O c. Both a) and b)