university o f liverpool department of electrical engineering and elec
Search for question
Question
UNIVERSITY O F
LIVERPOOL
Department of Electrical Engineering and Electronics
ELEC143 Coursework
Design of a two-stage inverter chain
Module
Coursework name
Component weight
Semester
HE Level
Lab location
ELEC143
Design of a two-stage inverter chain
20%
2
4
N/A
Work
Timetabled time
Suggested private study
Assessment method
Submission format
Submission deadline
Late submission
Resit opportunity
Marking policy
Anonymous marking
Feedback
Subject of relevance
Learning outcomes
Individual
0 hours
24 hours (preparation and report writing)
Individual, formal word-processed report
Online via Canvas (anonymous)
Standard University penalty applies
August resit period via resit exams
Marked and moderated independently
Yes
via Canvas
Inverter designs and layouts, MOSFET models
(LO5) Familiarity of common design rules for development
of layouts for silicon devices and simple circuits.
(S2) - Experience and enhancement of following discipline:
specific practical skills: designing & debugging digital circuits;
handling & measurement of components.
(S3) - Demonstrate ability in applying knowledge to: design
combination logic circuits with up to 4 inputs; analyse and to
design simple sequential logic circuits; an ability to design a
simple MOS circuit including tolerance and feature sizes.
(S4) - Knowledge of basic design methods for combinational
and sequential logic circuits; understanding of number
systems; knowledge of the laws of Boolean algebra;
understanding of how physical laws of semiconductor apply
to practical diodes & transistors; appreciation of why certain
materials are used in devices; familiarity with common
designs of devices, and simple MOS circuits.
- 1- Marking Criteria
Section
Marks
available
Report
10%
presentation
and structure
Introduction,
Method and
Calculations
30%
Device and
45%
circuit layouts
Discussions and
Conclusion
15%
Indicative characteristics
Adequate / pass
(40%)
• Contains cover page
information, table of contents,
sections with appropriate
headings.
• Comprehensible language;
punctuation, grammar and
spelling accurate.
• Equations legible, numbered
and presented correctly.
• Appropriately formatted
reference list.
Very good / Excellent
(> 40%)
• Word-processed with consistent
formatting.
• All sections clearly signposted.
•
·
Pages numbered, and figures
and tables captioned
appropriately.
Appropriate use of technical,
mathematic and academic
terminology and principles.
• Correct cross-referencing (of
figures, tables, equations) and
citations.
•
•
Appropriate use of references
and format.
Appendix containing any
additional evidence i.e. further
results, graphs, photographs
etc.
• Problem background
introduced clearly and
objectives correctly presented.
• Appropriate methodology used
in calculating the aspect ratio
of all devices.
• Justification of any
assumptions made.
• Aspect ratio of all devices
correctly presented in terms of
minimum feature size.
• Individual device layouts are
correctly presented.
• Different regions within
respective layout is easily
distinguishable.
• Appropriate scale is defined.
• Results from each layout is
accompanied by appropriate
commentary.
• Basic discussion
demonstrating an
understanding of the
underlying concepts.
• Conclusions correctly inferred
from the calculation, results
and layouts.
• Evidence of wider reading.
• Evidence of basic reflection
and self-criticism.
• All calculations shown in full.
• All devices are correctly
calculated.
• Summary table of the calculated
aspect ratio presented in terms
of minimum feature size.
• Design decisions are justified
using at least one external
source.
• Further justification and
explanation of any assumptions
made.
• All device layouts are correctly
the
presented in terms
minimum feature size.
• Appropriate alignment accuracy
is included within respective
layouts.
• Overall circuit layout is correctly
presented, i.e. correct
connections, including
interconnects and contact pads.
• Minimal area is utilised in the
circuit layout arrangement.
• Thorough analysis is presented,
including justification on the
selection of aspect ratios and
area minimisation.
• Meaningful reflection on the
limitations work, and insight into
possible realistic improvements.
-2- 1. Overview
The aim of this coursework is to design a two-
stage inverter circuit, shown in Figure 1. Initially,
this involves calculating respective dimensions
of the different devices in the circuit (i.e.
MOSFETs A, B, and C, and passive load
resistor RL) using appropriate models /
equations, and parameters / constants provided Vin
below. Following on this, respective layouts for
each of the devices, and an overall circuit,
including interconnects and contact pads, needs
to be generated accurately, on scaled or graph
RL
Vo'
Figure 1
Vout
wwww
VDD
paper/s with stipulated scale (e.g. 1 µm = 1 cm). Accurate alignment error between layouts
must also be included with minimal area utilised. All of the dimensions/areas of the layouts
need to be expressed in terms of the minimum feature size (2m).
2. Description:
The circuit in Figure 1 consists of 2-stage inverters (two NOT gates), with respective input,
Vin and output, Vout. The 1st stage of the inverter consists of an enhancement n-MOST A
(driver) and a saturated n-MOST C (load), whilst the 2nd stage consists of an enhancement
n-MOST B (driver) with a passive load RL. In terms of operation, the logic at the output
follows the logic at the input after some delay, i.e. if Vin is at logic 1, then Vout is logic 1 and
vice versa. This circuit forms part of a ring oscillator, which typically comprises of odd
number of inverters, connected in a loop as discussed in ELEC143. The output oscillates
between two logic levels, and used to determine gate delays or operation speeds of circuits.
However, for this coursework, the main objective is to understand and implement
approaches in generating and representing circuit layouts appropriately with effective use of
area as discussed in ELEC143.
3. Useful hints
Focus on the first-stage inverter (i.e. driver A and load C) and determine the respective
aspect ratios (W/L) of these transistors. Assume the input into A is at logic 1 (i.e. driver A is
on), then the intermediate output Vo' is at logic 0. This output logic is fed into the input of the
second inverter i.e. driver B. You will need to select an appropriate value for this
- 3- intermediate output voltage Vo' corresponding to a logic 0. Note this needs to be lower than
the threshold voltage of the driver B so as to ensure that B remains off at logic 0 input.
Furthermore, load C is always on and operates in saturation. Refer to ELEC143 lecture
notes on the MOSFET/inverters.
The on-resistances of the drivers A and B can be assumed to be the same. Similarly, the
on-resistance of load C can be assumed to be equal to that of the passive load RL. However,
the dimension of C is not the same as RL since these are different devices. Refer to
ELEC143 notes on p-n junction (passive load).
The layouts must consider the alignment accuracy (2a), which can be assumed to be equal
to the minimum feature size λm or multiple of 2m.
4. Parameter/constants
Below are respective values for use in the calculation:
i.
Minimum feature size, λm = 0.5 μm
ii.
Supply voltage, VDD = 5 V (logic 1 input)
iii.
Threshold voltage of the transistors, VT = 0.3 V
iv.
Sheet resistance for the load resistor, Rsheet = 100 Q2/square
V.
Device constant is given as below:
W
W
B = (μCo) = (Bo) —
L
L
Note: The mobility μ and gate capacitance Co can be assumed to be the same for all
transistors, i.e. ßo = 1.8 × 10-4 AV-2.
5. Report
Individual report should include ALL of your calculations and justify any assumption made.
The report must also include individual design layouts of all the devices and an overall
design layout of the circuit in Figure 1, including interconnects and contact pads on scaled
graph papers. The layouts must be expressed in terms of the minimum feature size with
appropriate alignment errors. Different shading could be used to differentiate regions of the
respective layouts. The area of the overall layout needs to be effectively utilised. The
deadline for the submission of the report is Wednesday 8th May 2023 by 23:59 on Canvas.
- 4-