Which answer below describes how the court reasoned that pesticide drift - as particulate matter - can constitute trespass O a. The court was persuaded by cases from other jurisdictions

that have held that particulate matter settling on another's property can constitute trespass O b. The court distinguished the present case from the precedential case upon which the lower court reached its ruling c. Where a particulate invasion negatively impacts the use of neighboring property - rather than just the quiet enjoyment of it - the invasion may constitute trespass O d. All of these factored into the court's reasoning