Question
What if you live in a community that has a large Muslim population. There have been complaints to the chief of police about a lack of representation of Muslim officers in your agency. After being directed by the chief of police to "reach out" to the Muslim community with the goal of increasing officer representation, w
View Answer
Try AI Generated Solution
Answer

What if you live in a community that has a large Muslim population. There have been complaints to the chief of police about a lack of representation of Muslim officers in your agency. After being directed by the chief of police to "reach out" to the Muslim community with the goal of increasing officer representation, what would you do?

Get solved by expert tutor

Not the answer you're looking for? Let our experts create a unique solution for you

Found 10 similar results for your question:

What was Dr. Ruan appealing about to the Supreme Court? (what law and section) What do scienter and mens rea mean, in the context of this case? From the last paragraph of the majority decision, before Justice Alito's concurrence, what did the Supreme Court hold on this issue and why? So, what might happen next in Dr. Ruan's case? Please give your analysis of this case, and develop your analysis.

2)Rule 4.3, in part, declaims "The lawyer shall not give legal advice to an unrepresented person, other than the advice to secure counsel, if the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the interests of such a person are or have a reasonable possibility of being in conflict with the interests of the client." What is the duty of a lawyer towards unrepresented persons? To what extent may a lawyer advise an unrepresented person? At what point is a lawyer-client relationship formed?

4) In your own words, explain the purpose for the rules governing "Transactions with Persons Other Than Clients." Select two scriptures that support the ethical principles contained in this section explaining how the scriptures support the specific ethical principles.

From the Johnson & Johnson opinion, please very briefly discuss the facts and background of the case. How is public nuisance defined in Oklahoma? What happened to the other co- defendants? According to the Oklahoma Supreme Court, what would have been a better tort claim? From our textbook or lectures, what is the definition of that other, better tort? What did the Oklahoma Supreme court rule, and why did the Oklahoma Supreme Court rule the way it did?

For those accused and convicted of any crime, such as Dr. Ruan, certain Constitutional rights are afforded. Please discuss in detail ALL the Constitutional protections given to any criminal defendant such as Dr. Ruan, from at least 4 Constitutional amendments. This question uses materials from ch. 5 and 8 of the textbook and corresponding posted lectures. Please use both the textbook (the constitution itself is in appendix A) and my slides and lectures. The textbook text omits one major constitutional amendment protecting criminal defendants, so please also see my slides. In other words, now please discuss and define ALL the protections given to those accused of a crime under at least 4 amendments to the Constitution.

Review the article, "Thinking Critically About Corrections: Prison Rape," located in Chapter 9 of the textbook, Corrections in the 21st Century. Do you believe there is merit to Dr. Gilligan's claims? If so, how would you propose addressing this issue? If not, why not? APA; "in text" citings; Your initial post should be at least 220 words in length. Remember to support your posting by citing your sources and including a working link to them if available. Sources other than your textbook or course- provided articles or resources will earn the highest scores. All posts should be thorough, well written, and relevant to the discussion topic. Minimal use of direct quotations expected; the majority of each post should be in your own words. You are expected to do outside research to inform and support your posts. Citing two outside source is required (other than the textbook or resources within the course). Textbook: Schmalleger, F. (2020). Corrections in the 21st Century (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education (US). https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781260805321 Page 275 Article "Thinking Critically About Corrections: Prison Rape" excerpt: THINKING CRITICALLY ABOUT CORRECTIONS/n(05). mips.//ccis.vitalsource.COM/BOOKS/370120000JJ21 Page 275 Article "Thinking Critically About Corrections: Prison Rape" excerpt: THINKING CRITICALLY ABOUT CORRECTIONS Prison Rape James Gilligan, M.D., contends that rape in prisons is "an intrinsic and universal part of the punishments that our government metes out to those whom it labels as 'criminal.""84 In essence, Gilligan suggests, prison administrators passively employ inmate-on-inmate rape as a management tool to control the prisoner population. Dr. Gilligan bases his charge on three contentions: First, the relevant legal authorities, from judges to prosecutors who send people to prison, to the prison officials who administer them, are all aware of the existence, the reality, and the near-universality of rape in the prisons. Indeed, this is one reason that many conscientious judges are extremely reluctant to send anyone to prison except when they feel compelled to, either by the violence of the crime or, as is increasingly true, by laws mandating prison sentences even for nonviolent crimes, such as drug offenses. Second, the conditions that stimulate such rapes (the enforced deprivation of other sources of self- esteem, respect, power, and sexual gratification) are consciously and deliberately imposed upon the prison population by the legal authorities. Third, all these authorities tacitly and knowingly tolerate this form of sexual violence, passively delegating to the dominant and most violent inmates the power and authority to deliver this form of punishment to the more submissive and nonviolent ones, so that the rapists in this situation are acting/nas the vicarious enforcers of a form of punishment that the legal system does not itself enforce formally or directly. Given that rape is universally acknowledged as a crime, Dr. Gilligan's charge is tantamount to an accusation of criminal conspiracy of monumental proportions. Do you believe there is merit to Gilligan's claims? If so, how would you propose addressing this issue? The Staff Subculture The staff culture is generally instilled in correctional officer trainees by more experienced officers and by work experiences. Socialization into the staff subculture begins on the first day of academy training or the first day of work (whichever comes first). One of the most important beliefs of the staff subculture is that officers should support one another. Some people argue that the staff subculture is dangerous because it can sustain improper and even illegal behavior while forcing correctional officers to keep to themselves what they know about such behavior. Others, however, suggest that the staff subculture is a positive element in the correctional world. It is important to correctional officer morale, they claim. They also suggest that it "fills the gaps" in formal training by establishing informal rules to guide staff behavior and decision making in difficult situations. The staff subculture can provide informal "workarounds" when the formal requirements of a correctional officer's position seem unrealistic. Do you think the staff subculture contributes to or detracts from meeting the goals of institutional corrections? Why? Do you think the staff subculture benefits or harms the lives and working environment of correctional officers? Explain. What functions of the staff subculture can you identify? Rate each of those functions as positive or

3)Rule 4.1b states that "a lawyer shall not knowingly: fail to disclose a material fact to a third person when discourse is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by a client, unless disclosure is prohibited by Rule 1.6." What is meant by a material fact? What is the intent and purpose of this rule? How does this rule correlate with scriptural commands towards interactions with each other?

Locate a current article (within the last 2 years) from a professional journal (such as Harvard Business Review, Wall Street Journal, etc) that deals with a topic about either Business Crime or Business Torts. Brief the article (specify Issue, Rule, Analysis, and Conclusion) and attach it to the post. Very briefly summarize the facts in a sentence or two (do not copy and paste the entire article into the discussion). The Analysis should incorporate the applicable information from our textbook with citations. The conclusion is YOUR conclusion on the outcome or pending outcome of the case. Attach a copy of your lawsuit.

Please answer the following questions. From the first paragraph of the case, what were the doctors convicted of, and what was their sentence? From section B of the case, sections 1 through 7, on trial evidence, very briefly summarize the background of the case leading up to the convictions. Ruan appealed multiple issues related to the trial, including multiple counts of his conviction. Please review count 16 starting on page 61, and very briefly discuss, including what the appeals court did concerning this count. Now please review count 19 starting on page 66, count 1 starting on page 68, and the money laundering charges staring on the bottom of page 71, and very briefly discuss, including what the appeals court did concerning these counts.

1) 4.2 says "In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of he representation with a person the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized to do so by law or a court order." What is meant by "authorized to do so by law or a court order?" What are some examples of this authorization? Furthermore, list several examples of what would constitute forbidden communication with a represented party. Detail why this rule is required.