tutorbin

criminal law homework help

Boost your journey with 24/7 access to skilled experts, offering unmatched criminal law homework help

tutorbin

Trusted by 1.1 M+ Happy Students

WhatsApp Support

Get Instant
Online Homework Help
via WhatsApp

Get instant homework help from top tutors—just a WhatsApp message away. 24/7 hw help support for all your academic needs!

A
S
M
R
★★★★★
2M+ students trust TutorBin
Your WhatsApp Number
phone
or
⚡ Instant reply
🔒 100% private
👨‍🏫 Top tutors
🌍 All subjects
*Get instant homework help from top tutors—just a WhatsApp message away. 24/7 support for all your academic needs!
2M+ Students Helped24/7 Live SupportExpert TutorsAll Subjects CoveredInstant Response100% ConfidentialTop Rated ServiceMoney-back Guarantee2M+ Students Helped24/7 Live SupportExpert TutorsAll Subjects CoveredInstant Response100% ConfidentialTop Rated ServiceMoney-back Guarantee

Recently Asked criminal law Questions

Expert help when you need it
  • Q1: 2/8/24, 12:42 PM Assignment Details Unit 5 - Individual Project (60 points) Description AIU Portal: Introduction to Criminal Law CRJS205 You will create this assignment following the Assignment Detail instructions below. Review the tutorial How to Submit an Individual Project. Assignment Details Close Due: Tue, Feb 13 | Printer Friendly Version This week we are studying constitutional protections. This includes the constitutionality of capital crimes and the death penalty. The U.S. Supreme Court recently held in Jones v. Mississippi that the Eighth Amendment does not require the sentencer/judge to make a finding of permanent incorrigibility before sentencing a juvenile to a sentence of life without parole. Instead, it only needs to be shown that the judge had discretion under the sentencing statute as to whether to give the offender life without parole or not. This video explores the recent U.S. Supreme Court case of Jones v. Mississippi (University of Richmond Law School of Law, 2021): The Synopsis: Jones v. Mississippi, 2021 Using what you have learned from this week's reading assignment, Intellipath, and other resources, address the following in a 2 page paper: ● Read the Jones v. Mississippi case • Summarize the facts of the case in your own words. https://studentlogin.aiuniv.edu/?v=26&ssid=2&cid=5#/class/314230/home/unit/5/unit-assignments 1/3 2/8/24, 12:42 PM AIU Portal: Introduction to Criminal Law CRJS205 Discuss whether you agree with the majority opinion or Justice Sotomayor's dissenting opinion. Explain your answer. ● Please submit your assignment. For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials. The following grading rubric will be used for this assignment: Grading Rubric. Assignment Reminders: Please submit your assignment. • Make sure you submit this assignment by the listed due date. Late deductions will apply for this assignment. Please refer to the Late Submission of Assignment policy. ● ● If you need assistance, please view the Troubleshooting tips. 1. Resave in the proper format per the Assignment Detail instructions and resubmit. 2. Submit with a different Web browser. 3. Submit from a different computer. 4. Call Technical Support at 877-221-5800, Menu Option 2. They are open 24/7. 5. If you are still having difficulties after trying steps 1-4, please contact your course instructor. Reference McConnell, J. [University of Richmond School of Law]. (2021, April 27). They synopsis: Jones v. Mississippi, 2021 [Video]. You Tube. https://youtu.be/EZ18Y0799uM Instructor's Comments There are no instructor comments added at this time. https://studentlogin.aiuniv.edu/?v=26&ssid=2&cid=5#/class/314230/home/unit/5/unit-assignments 2/3 2/8/24, 12:42 PM AIU Portal: Introduction to Criminal Law CRJS205 https://studentlogin.aiuniv.edu/?v=26&ssid=2&cid=5#/class/314230/home/unit/5/unit-assignments 3/3See Answer
  • Q2: 2/16/24, 7:48 PM Assignment Details Unit 1 - Individual Project (50 points) Description AIU Portal: Foundations of Corrections CRJS220 You will create this assignment following the Assignment Detail instructions below. Review the tutorial How to Submit an Individual Project. Close Due: Tue, Feb 20 | Printer Friendly Version Assignment Details Crime in America has become a normal part of everyday life. There have been ongoing discussions on crime control and possible policies that could slow down crime in America. However, when it comes to slowing down the willingness to commit crime, there are two theories that have had a significant impact on the reduction of crime. The two theories are Specific Deterrence and General Deterrence. Specific deterrence focuses on the individual, while general deterrence focuses on the general public. While each specific and general deterrence has a different focus, the overall purpose of these theories are preventing crime. Using the knowledge that you have gained from this week's reading assignments, Intellipath and MUSE assets, and other information provided, address the following questions in a 2-3 page paper: • Identify and discuss the similarities and differences between general deterrence and specific deterrence. Using the resources and materials provided this week in class, discuss a criminal case that best explains each theory. • Provide your opinion on whether you believe these theories work at preventing future crimes. Please submit your assignment. While it is not necessary to provide complete citations in an APA format, your paper should include URLs and titles for any information used to support your position. You can use this template to help plan and write your paper: CRJS220 Unit 1 Individual Project Template Assignment Reminders: For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials. The following grading rubric will be used for this assignment: Grading Rubric. ● Please submit your assignment. • Make sure you submit this assignment by the listed due date. Late deductions will apply for this assignment. Please refer to the Late Submission of Assignment policy. • If you need assistance, please view the Troubleshooting tips. 1. Resave in the proper format per the Assignment Detail instructions and resubmit. 2. Submit with a different Web browser. 3. Submit from a different computer. 4. Call Technical Support at 877-221-5800, Menu Option 2. They are open 24/7. https://studentlogin.aiuniv.edu/?v=26&ssid=2&cid=5#/class/320294/home/unit/1/unit-assignments 1/3 2/16/24, 7:48 PM AIU Portal: Foundations of Corrections CRJS220 5. If you are still having difficulties after trying steps 1-4, please contact your course instructor. Instructor's Comments There are no instructor comments added at this time. https://studentlogin.aiuniv.edu/?v=26&ssid=2&cid=5#/class/320294/home/unit/1/unit-assignments 2/3 2/16/24, 7:48 PM AIU Portal: Foundations of Corrections CRJS220 https://studentlogin.aiuniv.edu/?v=26&ssid=2&cid=5#/class/320294/home/unit/1/unit-assignments 3/3See Answer
  • Q3:CJAD 415 - Discussions; General Description For your initial posts, make sure that you answer each part of the discussion promptly with a thorough, original response. Each initial post should have a minimum of 8-10 sentences. At least two references are required for each initial post. Be sure to provide APA in-text citations (including Page Numbers) for all resources. 1) Textbook reference excerpts with page numbers are provided. 2) In addition to textbook excerpts, At least ONE Outside reference with citation including page number is required. Outside reference: Tudor's choice 3) At least 190 words 4) I request Rohan MO, if available. 5) Prag report - needed for discussions 6) Instructor is now using https://www.zerogpt.com/ for discussions, I will need a report. 7) Please process thru razorpay, include discount, and refund reimbursement Rubric: 1) Post is well developed, fully addresses, and develops all aspects of discussion or reflection. 2) The initial post should be at least 8-10 well developed sentences. 3) At least two references or resources Are used for each initial post. Provides accurate APA in-text citations for all resources./n Discussion 13 Discuss the merits and current importance of the Miranda doctrine. What are the benefits and costs of this doctrine to society? Do the benefits offset the costs? Do the benefits offset the costs? Why or why not? Important discussion points (outside references required): What are the benefits and costs of this doctrine to society? Do the benefits offset the costs? Opinions (Required): Do the benefits offset the costs? Why or why not? Learning Resources: Chapter 11 An Unreal Dream (Video) Required! In the video, Do You Have the Right to Remain Silent? | Salinas v. Texas, you will learn of a hotly debated decision that makes a subtle but profound distinction of when and how your Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination is preserved. Mr. Salinas remained silent without invoking any constitutional rights, yet the State was allowed to comment on his silence as substantive evidence for the jury to consider as to his guilt or innocence (Lynch). As you ponder the significance of this decision, ask yourself the question of who is most likely to be impacted by this decision. The phrase "you have the right to remain silent" has become so commonplace because of television crime shows that many keep silent when in the presence of law enforcement. Will this decision require citizens to respond with "I take the 5th” in all interactions with law enforcement? References del Carmen, Rolando V. Criminal Procedure: Law and Practice. 10th ed, Belmont, California: Cengage Learning, 2017. eText Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 615 Lynch, Tim. CATO at Liberty. 17 June 2013. 5 December 2019. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Salinas v. Texas, 570 U.S. 178 (2013) Textbook Citation: Carmen, R.V. D., & Hemmens, C. (2016). Criminal Procedure: Law and Practice (10th ed.). Cengage Limited. https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9781337472395 Textbook Excerpts - with page numbers: Page 327: THE FIFTH AMENDMENT to the U.S. Constitution provides that "no person shall ... be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” This right has been a source of controversy and has generated a host of issues, some of which are still unresolved. The main question is this: When are confessions and admissions admissible as evidence in a criminal trial, and when are they excludable? The answers are not simple, but this chapter's discussion should provide some insights. One case stands out far above all other cases on the admissibility of confessions and admissions. That case is Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). Miranda is perhaps the best known criminal procedure decision ever issued by the Supreme Court, and it was and remains controversial. It is perhaps the only U.S. Supreme Court decision that has led to the creation of a new word, one that is widely used by police, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and judges: Mirandized, meaning that the suspect has been given the Miranda warnings. By the Miranda rule evidence obtained by the police during custodial interrogations cannot be used in court during trial unless the defendant was first informed of the right not to incriminate himself or herself and the right to a lawyer. (Mirandized), and unless that right was waived intelligently and voluntarily. Mirandized: a term used by law enforcement officers to indicate that the suspect has been given the Miranda warnings. Miranda rule: evidence obtained by the police during custodial interrogations cannot be used in court during trial unless the defendant was first informed of the right not to incriminate himself or herself and the right to a lawyer. Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Page 328: Voluntary Confessions Before the Miranda decision, the Supreme Court decided the admissibility of confessions and admissions on a case-by-case basis. The sole test was whether the confession was voluntary or involuntary, based on a totality of the circumstances. Voluntariness was determined by the courts based on whether the suspect's will was “broken" or "overborne" by the police during interrogation and taking into account all of the facts and circumstances in the case. This approach did not provide much guidance to the lower courts because the Supreme Court had failed to set any definitive guidelines by which the admissibility of confessions could be determined. In general, the Court held that confessions obtained by force or coercion could not be used in court; conversely, confessions were admissible if they were voluntary. Voluntariness was the standard used, but the meaning of that word was difficult to determine and changed over the years. In criminal justice, a confession means that a person says he or she committed the act; an admission means that the person owns up to something related to the act but may not have committed it. Confession: a person says he or she committed the act. Admission: a person admits to something related to the act but may not have committed it. Originally, only confessions or statements obtained by physical force (such as beating, whipping, or maiming) were considered inadmissible. Later, courts recognized that coercion could be mental as well as physical. Even then, the hard question remained: At what point did physical or mental (psychological) coercion become so excessive as to render the confession involuntary? Clearly, physical torture was prohibited, but what about a push, a shove, a slap, or a mere threat? As for mental coercion, suppose the police did not physically abuse the suspect but simply detained him "until he talked"-was that coercion? If so, how long must the detention last before the confession could be considered coerced? A few hours? A day? A week? Page 328: Coercion and Brutality—Confession not Valid A deputy sheriff, accompanied by other persons, took a suspect (brown) to a murder scene where he was questioned about the crime. Brown denied his guilt and was hanged by a rope from the limb of a tree for a period of time. He was then let down, after which he again denied his guilt. He was next tied to the tree and whipped, but he still refused to confess and was allowed to go home. Later brown was seized again and whipped until he confessed. The Court reversed the conviction and held that the confession was a product of utter coercion and brutality and thus violated the Fourteenth Amendment right to due process. Deception-Confession not Valid The defendant was suspected of murder in New York. About ten days after the murder, Spano telephoned a close friend who was a rookie police officer in the New York Police Department. Spano told his friend that he (Spano) had taken a terrific beating from the murder victim, and, because he was dazed, did not know what he was doing when he shot the victim. The officer relayed this information to his superiors. Spano was brought in for questioning, but his attorney advised him not to answer any questions. The department called in the rookie friend and told him to inform Spano that his telephone call had caused the officer a lot of trouble. The officer was instructed to win sympathy from Spano for the sake of the officer's wife and children. Spano initially refused to cooperate, but after his friend's fourth try, he finally agreed to tell the police about the shooting. Spano was convicted and appealed. The Court said that the use of deception as a means of psychological pressure to induce a confession was a violation of the defendant's constitutional rights, and therefore the Court excluded the evidence. Confession not Voluntary-Confession not Valid The defendant was charged with murder and found guilty by a jury. While in jail pending trial, Rogers was questioned about the killing. The interrogation started during the afternoon of the day of his arrest and continued through the evening. During the interrogation, Rogers was allowed to smoke and was given a sandwich and some coffee. At no time was he ever subjected to violence or threat of violence by the police. Six hours after the start of the interview, Rogers still refused to give any information. The police then indicated that they were about to have Rogers's wife taken into custody, whereupon Rogers indicated his willingness to confess. The confession was introduced as evidence during the trial, and Rogers was convicted. The Court held that the confession by Rogers was involuntary, and therefore not admissible, on the grounds that the accused did not have complete freedom of mind when making his confession. Suspect Denied Counsel at the Police Station-Confession Not Valid Escobedo was arrested for murder and interrogated for several hours at the police station, during which time he was persuaded to confess. During the interrogation, Escobedo repeatedly asked to see his lawyer, who was also at the police station at that time and who demanded to see him. The police refused both requests and proceeded to interrogate Escobedo. He eventually confessed, was tried, and was convicted. On appeal, the Court held that Escobedo was denied his right to counsel, so no statement taken during the interrogation could be admitted against him at the trial. The Court said that “where, as here, the investigation is no longer a general inquiry into the unsolved crime but has begun to focus on a particular suspect... no statement elicited by the police during the investigation may be used against him at a criminal trial." Page 332: Miranda's Significance Miranda v. Arizona had a huge impact on day-to-day crime investigation. It drew a bright-line rule for admissibility of confessions and admissions and led to changes that have since become an accepted part of routine police work. No other law enforcement case initially generated more controversy within and outside police circles. Supporters of the Miranda decision hailed it as properly protective of individual rights, whereas critics accused the Court of being soft on crime and of coddling criminals. The 5-to-4 split among the justices served to fan the flames of the controversy in its early stages, with opponents of the ruling hoping that a change in Court composition would hasten its demise. But that has not happened, nor s it likely to happen. The Miranda warnings, with variations, have been adopted in other countries and have in fact become a popular export of the U.S. criminal justice system. Miranda is unusual because a Court decision seldom tells the police exactly what they should do. In Miranda, the Court did not simply say that a constitutional right was violated; it went further and prescribed in no uncertain terms what the police should do. In clear language, the Court mandated that a suspect “must be warned prior to any questioning that he has a right to remain silent, that anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, that he has a right to the presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him prior to any questioning if he so desires.” Seldom has the Court been as specific in its instructions about what the police should do. Miranda also clarified some of the ambiguous terms used in Escobedo. "by custodial interrogation," said the Court, "we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way." It then added this footnote: "This is what we meant in Escobedo when we spoke of an investigation which had focused on an accused." Yet the focus test used in Escobedo was abandoned by the Court in later cases; in its place, the custodial interrogation test was used to determine whether the Miranda warnings needed to be given. The Escobedo case brought the right to counsel to the police station prior to trial; the Miranda case went beyond the police station and brought the right to counsel out into the streets if custodial interrogation was to take place.See Answer
  • Q4:TO/DO Want to try to use both research methods that is qualitative and quantitative Research Question: What effects does the mta have on fare evasion on public transportation? Word Limit 100 WordsSee Answer
  • Q5: Assignment Details Unit 7 - Discussion Board (60 points) Description In your own words, answer this unit's discussion questions in a main post (minimum 200 words), and respond to at least two peers' postings (minimum 75 words each). Assignment Details Introduction By this point, you should have a good idea of what your thesis statement will be and the main points that you will make to support your opinion. Now, it's time to ensure that your sources have the type of information that can be used as evidence to prove that your points are valid. The concepts and skills presented in the intellipath lessons will help you complete this assignment, specifically the following lessons: • Body Paragraphs • Incorporating Source Information With Your Ideas • Giving Feedback: The Peer Review Main Post Instructions Using the outline that you created for the Unit 6 Individual Project, you will share your thesis statement and 3 main points that support the thesis statement with your classmates. Address the following: 1. Begin your main post with your current thesis statement so that your peers understand the direction of your argument. 2. Starting with the 3 main points from your outline in the Unit 6 IP and drawing in your work in Units 2, 3, 4, and 5, write 1 paragraph for each of the three main points, for a total of 3 body paragraphs. Incorporate evidence from at least 3 sources from the AIU Library into your paragraphs using APA style in-text citations. Do additional research using the Opposing Viewpoints database if you do not have three sources that you used in the earlier units. You may use sources from the Internet, but at least 3 of the sources must be from the AIU Library. 3. Keep in mind that your audience may be hesitant to agree with you, so use the information from the sources wisely to show that your opinion is valid. Consider how your point of view addresses the diverse course audience. 4. Create a References section at the end of your post for each of your three sources, and list them alphabetically. Use the course resources and the APA intellipath lessons to help you format each entry. Your main post will include your thesis statement, 3 paragraphs with APA in-text citations, and a references section with at least 3 entries. Use APA Model Citations and References for help to format your work. 1/2 AIU Portal: English Composition II ENGL107 Check the Unit 8 IP Template here to see how your Unit 7 main post connects to the rough draft in Unit 8 and your final draft in Unit 10. Instructions for Peer Posts It's important to provide your peers with detailed and constructive feedback so that they can write a stronger argument for the Unit 8 and Unit 10 Individual Projects. In your replies, provide feedback on your peers' thesis statement. Explain if you are uncertain about anything or if you think the wording could be improved. Also, provide feedback on the sources that your peers have provided (use the TRAP test for evaluating sources) and the information that they will use to support their opinion. Consider if the information they cite would be enough to convince you that their argument is valid. Provide suggestions on how to improve their argument or sources by referring to intellipath lessons or sources that you have found. Encourage your peers to look back at a specific intellipath lesson or class resource that will help them improve their thesis statements or argument. Discussion Board Instructions: ● How many posts: o One main post (minimum 200 words) o Two responses to others' postings (minimum 75 words each) o At least one post should mention learning resources (e.g. textbook, intellipath®, Library resources) • When to post: ● ● o Posts must be completed on a minimum of two separate days of the unit. o First post must be posted before midnight (Central Time) on Friday. It can be either your main post or a response to another post. o Second and third posts must be posted before Tuesday midnight (Central Time). o Late penalty for Discussion Boards is found in the Late Submission of Assignments policy in the AIU Catalog. How to post to the Discussion Board: o AIU Student Mobile App View (Video). o Desktop View (Video) How to make the best of class discussions: o Why Is the Discussion Board Important? (Video) o How to Make the Most of Discussion Boards (Video) Grading Rubric • Access the ENGL107 Unit 7 Discussion Board Rubric. Instructor's Comments There are no instructor comments added at this time. 2/2See Answer
  • Q6: Assignment Details Unit 2 - Discussion Board (75 points) Description In your own words, answer this unit's discussion questions in a main post (recommended minimum 200 words), and respond to at least 2 peers' postings (recommended minimum 75 words). After you have reviewed the Assignment Details below, click the Launch Discussion Board link under the Assignments tab for this unit to open the Discussion Board and make your post. Use these videos for help on how to post to the Discussion Board: • AIU Student Mobile app view • Desktop view People often think of the punishment of criminals and they think of some form of incarceration such as jail or prison. Correctional punishment can be carried out in various ways. While incarceration is the first form of punishment that comes to mind, there are alternatives to incarceration. For this discussion, you will explore incarceration alternatives and answer the following questions: • How do you believe alternatives to incarceration serve as punishment? • What do you believe to be the most successful alternative to incarceration? Why is it successful? Discussion Board Reminders: • Must have three posts: A Main Post and two replies to peers. o First post: Either your main post or a reply to others must be posted before midnight CT (Central time) on Friday of each week. o Second and third post: Must be posted on a different day from the first post. Connect to Content: At least one post must refer to course learning materials. See the Academic Resource on Discussion Boards for help with connecting to the content. • Engaging in Class Discussions: For more information on making the most of your class dialog, review the Academic Resource on Discussion Boards. ● Grading Rubric Assignment Criteria Quality of Main Post 34 Points Total Proficient Descriptor Student's main post meets or exceeds the following requirements: • Responds completely to all of parts of discussion question (10 points) Points /34 pts. 1/3 Response to Peers 30 Points Total Support from Learning Resources Total 5 Points Total Professional Writing 6 points AIU Portal: Foundations of Corrections CRJS220 • Communicates content information accurately and/or logically (8 points) • Delivers a thoughtful response demonstrating insights and reflections (8 points) • Connects to key content concepts and personal experiences (if applicable) (8 points) Responds to a minimum of 2 peers (15 points per response): • Substantive response (8 points) • Furthers the conversation with peers. Examples could include (7 points): o Provides additional resources o Connects accurately to key concepts o Shares personal or professional experiences o Contributes new information or perspective o Presents a competing viewpoint At least one post mentions course resources or library resources. Response is well-organized, clear, and free of grammatical and mechanical errors. Posts demonstrate courtesy and respect for others. Instructor's Comments There are no instructor comments added at this time. /30 pts. /5 pts. /6 pts. 175 pts. 2/3 AIU Portal: Foundations of Corrections CRJS220 https://studentlogin.aiuniv.edu/?v=26&ssid=2&cid=5#/class/320294/home/unit/2/unit-assignments 3/3See Answer
  • Q7:Assignment Details Imagine you are a judge and the last three criminal cases you presided over all yielded three guilty verdicts. You have ordered e investigations for all three offenders. The se Investigation report has been returned and it is now time to sentence the offenders. You are properly equipped and ready to sentence each of the offenders based on the recommended sentencing range and the Investigation report. In your paper, you will explain what sentence you would give for each offender and your rationale for selecting those punishments. You can modity the sentence outside of the range, but you have to explain why you modified the sentence and explain any expected backlash from this sentence. . Offender 1: Committed the aime of vehicular homicide. He is a veteran and is married with three children. He is a college graduate and he works in city government. He has no arrest history. His character reference returned that he is a citizen. Recommended sentence: 5 to 10 years in prison, followed by probation for three years. Offender 2: Committed the aime of home invasion and robbery. She has several past arrests ranging from drug charges to robbery. She did not graduate from high school and has been in and out of the system since he was a juvenile. She has no kids and does not work legally. Her character reference returned that she is a menace, a threat to society, and is gang attillated. Recommended sentence: 20 years to life, followed by probation for 10 years Offender 3: Committed the aime of Grand Theft and Identity theft. He has several arrests, but all were non-violent offenses. He has been to drug rehabilitation twice in the past and was successful in both situations. His character reference returned that he is a good person when he is not on drugs. However, when on drugs, he has been accused of stealling from his own family and people in the neighborhood. Recommended sentence: 1 to 3 years in prison, followed by probation for five years. While on probation, he must attend inpatient rehabilitation. Using the knowledge that you have gained from this week's reading assignments, and MUSE assets, and other information provided, address the following questions in a 2-3 page paper: • • What was the sentence given for offender 1 and your rationale for the sentence? What was the sentence given for offender 2 and your rationale for the sentence? What was your sentence given for offender 3 and your rationale for the sentence? • What part of this process was the most difficult for you as the judge? Why do you think that was? • How do you think the community will react to the sentences you chose? What are the long- term ramifications of the sentences you chose? While it is not necessary to provide complete citations in an APA format, your paper should include URLS and tiles for any information used to support your position.See Answer
  • Q8: TO DO: Read the academic integrity scenarios provided in the Topic Material "Policy Violations," located on the GCU website. (DOC FILE ATTACHED) As you read these scenarios, think about how these types of situations might arise in your academic career. How does academic dishonesty undermine the purpose of graduate school? The DQ response must be 150-200 words and have at least one citation and one reference in APA format./n Consider the following situations, and decide whether or not an academic integrity violation has occurred. 1. Student A collaborates with Student B on a nursing cohort assignment. Student A takes Student B's assignment and uses it as her own for another class. Student B did not authorize Student A to use the assignments. Answer: Yes, violation has occurred. Both students are in violation for collaborating on an assignment without express permission from the instructor. Student B is also in violation of the Code of Conduct for cheating. The following policies would apply to one or both students: • Collaborating in an unsanctioned manner - Students must work individually on homework, assignments and other assigned coursework, unless collaboration has been expressly permitted by the instructor. Students who collaborate without express permission of their instructor must inform the instructor of the nature of their collaboration. Cheating, attempting to cheat or assisting others to cheat, including dishonest activity or unauthorized use of any resource or materials in any academic exercise. • Presenting work that has been prepared by someone other than yourself, including the purchase or sharing of work. 2. A student buys a test bank booklet with all the answers to the course assignments. The student proceeds to sell the test bank and collect funds for the test bank. Answer: The student is in violation of several policies by buying and distributing the test bank. At no time is it acceptable to buy a test bank for any reason. Doing so will result in university-level penalties. Here are the following violations: • Cheating, attempting to cheat or assisting others to cheat - This also includes dishonest activity or unauthorized use of any resources or materials in any academic exercise. • Unauthorized assistance – Using materials not authorized by the faculty member to complete an assignment, or completion of an assignment by someone other than the student, including, but not limited to, providing/receiving exam answers, using faculty materials, answer keys or solution manuals. 3. A student has taken COM-101 and has passed with a grade of "A." The student is now taking ENG- 106 and has a similar assignment to one he completed in COM101. He reuses one of his assignments and submits it as an assignment in ENG-106. Answer: This is considered "self-plagiarism". You cannot re-use any portions of a paper from another class and submit it for a current class. At GCU, our rule for submitting work you have already submitted is that the items can be submitted for the "same class, same assignment.” Please note, when you are retaking a class, it is best to notify the instructor that you are retaking the course and may be resubmitting assignments. However, if your assignment was plagiarized the first time, this will be caught by Turnitin and you are subject to penalties for plagiarism, regardless of whether you are repeating the course. In this case, the following policy would apply: • Submitting work that has been prepared and used for a different course, wholly or in part, and without appropriate citation of the original work and prior approval of faculty. 4. A student has a finance course and is struggling with the math problems. The student finds the math problem with the answer on the Internet. In turn, the student copies and pastes the answers from ● the Internet in the assignment and turns it in as complete. Answer: Yes, this is plagiarism. Also, depending on the type of source in which the student located the information, this infraction could also be considered unauthorized assistance, which includes the use of items such as instructor guides or solutions manuals. Policy violations may include: • Plagiarizing, intentionally or unintentionally, the words, works or ideas of others without proper citation or acknowledgement and representing them as one's own in any academic exercise. • Paraphrasing sources which do not represent the student's original words or ideas without proper citation or acknowledgement. • Using materials not authorized by the faculty member to complete an assignment, or completion of an assignment by someone other than the student, including, but not limited to, providing/receiving exam answers, using faculty materials, answer keys or solution manuals. 5. A student writes a paper and receives a Turnitin rate of 97 percent, which links to oppapers.com. The student receives a zero for the assignment. The student feels they should receive maximum credit for the paper and feels the instructor is wrong for giving zero credit. Answer: This is a policy violation; at no time is it okay to use an online term paper clearing house or other commercial websites distributing term papers. The following policies apply: • Plagiarizing, intentionally or unintentionally, the words, works or ideas of others without proper citation or acknowledgement and representing them as one's own in any academic exercise. • Paraphrasing sources which do not represent the student's original words or ideas without proper citation or acknowledgement. • Presenting work that has been prepared by someone other than yourself, including the purchase or sharing of work. 3300 W. Camelback Road, Phoenix, AZ 85017 | gcu.edu 15GCU0245 POLICY VIOLATIONS 6. A student is struggling with their first assignment in a new course and looks for examples of the completed assignment online. A website is found which allows the student to view assignments as long as they submit an old assignment of their own. Answer: Students are not permitted to use other student's work to complete an assignment. You should utilize other resources such as your instructor or the GCU Learning Lounge to help you complete the assignment. Also, submitting previous work to any paper selling website is a policy violation; specifically, the following would apply, assuming the website was used to complete the paper and submit a previous paper: • Plagiarizing, intentionally or unintentionally, the words, works or ideas of others without proper citation or acknowledgement and representing them as one's own in any academic exercise. Paraphrasing sources which do not represent the student's original words or ideas without proper citation or acknowledgement. • Presenting work that has been prepared by someone other than yourself, including the purchase or sharing of work. • Selling or providing papers, essays, discussion questions, assignments or any part of the university curriculum to online term paper clearinghouses or other ●See Answer
  • Q9:BIBLICAL TORTS RESEARCH PAPER ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW This assignment requires research into Scripture related to tort law. This research will require examination of the distinctions between the law of torts as outlined in scripture and modern tort law. Completion of this assignment will show the influence of scripture on the development of modern tort law and will deepen the understanding of both a biblical worldview related to civil law as well as develop knowledge of various tort causes of action. INSTRUCTIONS You will research and locate appropriate passages from the Bible that illustrate and demonstrate the application of tort law. You must clearly articulate whether the biblical application of tort law is consistent with the contemporary legal standards related to tort law. You must compare and contrast the biblical remedy for the tort in Scripture with the contemporary remedies present in the legal system in the United States today. The research paper must be 6-8 pages, double- spaced, and in 12-point font, exclusive of footnotes/endnotes. The paper must be cited in current Bluebook format with at least 5 sources, including Scripture.See Answer
  • Q10:9:04 AM Fri Mar 1 1.08 Activity 2 Class Home Plan Content Progress Grades Tools ● ●●● LAW111_FEB_CrimJustice_Sec1_Sem2_23... Required Materials • Word processing software • Blank paper Pencil/pen learning.k12.com Front Page Newspaper Article ● Feedback During this time, most people learned about local and national happenings through newspaper reporting. Which is why, in this activity, you'll serve as a newspaper journalist reporting about one of the following events: By now, we are familiar with the history of private security and how security practices have evolved over the years. One of the most influential people in American history were the founders of the Pinkerton National Detective Agency. Giving rise to the term 'private eye,' it was the Pinkerton brothers who established an independent police force in America during the 1800s. • The February 1861 Baltimore plot to assassinate president-elect Abraham Lincoln • The January 1875 attack on Jesse James' mother and brother The July 1892 Homestead Steel Strike Massacre Activity Details | X < > 70% More ♥ < >/n9:04 AM Fri Mar 1 LAW111_FEB_CrimJustice_Sec1_Sem2_23... Class Home Plan Content Progress Grades Tools • Lead sentence • Introduction ● ●●● 1.08 Activity 2 Through research, you'll uncover a Pinkerton connection to the event and prepare to write an article as if you were a journalist during the time period (1st person artifact.) You'll want to highlight the facts of the event, include information about Pinkerton involvement, and give your personal opinion on what should be done to prevent future happenings. learning.k12.com Opening quotation Step 1: Select an Event and Complete Research First, you'll want to choose one of the three events mentioned above. Which one seems most interesting? Which one is most newsworthy? Once you make your choice, you'll need to research and take notes on facts of the event and Pinkerton involvement. At the very least, you'll need to know the who, what, when, where, and why. You can put this information into a word processing document or write it down on paper. • Main body Step 2: Create Your Outline Before you write your actual article, you'll want to learn the steps to creating a solid news piece. This Scholastic article is a good place to begin as it suggests the following parts: Closing quotation • Conclusion Feedback More ♥ Activity Details | X < > 70% < >/n9:05 AM Fri Mar 1 LAW111_FEB_CrimJustice_Sec1_Sem2_23... 1.08 Activity 2 Class Home Plan Content Progress Grades Tools ●●● TABLE Grading Rubric learning.k12.com Full Credit But first, you'll need to create an outline. This will be your first draft, not your actual article. Partial Credit Step 3: Write Your Article Once you are happy with how your draft looks, copy your rough draft into your final word processing document. You might even want to use a newspaper or columned template to make your final article look legitimate! To complete this activity, submit your final copy, making sure all text is legible. Little Credit Feedback | X < > More ♥ Newspaper Formatting Student submitted a newspaper article that included all of the required parts and followed the styling guidelines. Activity Details 70% Student submitted a newspaper article that included most of the required parts and mostly followed the styling guidelines. Student submitted a newspaper article that included little of the required parts and did not follow the otuling muidelines < >See Answer
  • Q11: Instructions: Part 2: Annotated Bibliography (100 points, 10%) Annotated bibliographies provide you with the opportunity to cite, summarize, and compare and contrast resources you will use in a project. You will cite each resource in APA style, write an approximately 150-word description that summarizes the central theme and scope of the resource, and compare and contrast it with other resources. For more information on annotated bibliographies, consult UMGC's How to Write an Annotated Bibliography. For this project, you are to identify at least 10 original sources of research from scholarly sources. At least 3-4 of your sources must have been published within the past 3 years. Depending on the assignment, the annotated bibliography may serve a number of purposes, including but not limited to reviewing the literature on a particular subject, illustrating the quality of research you have done, providing examples of the types of resources available, describing other items on a topic that may be of interest to the reader, and/or exploring the subject for further research. Annotated Bibliography, specifically the following critical elements must be addressed: • Summarize the central theme of the resource. • Include a paragraph in which you do the following: o Evaluate the author's authority or background. o Explain how this resource will work in conjunction with other cited works to illuminate the topic of interest. NOTE: this is for my domestic violence class. I need 10 bibliographies. the state I decided to pick was north dakota There's no case study you can literally look up different DV cases in north Dakota that's considered a source. it shouldn't take long and write 150 words about it Deliverables include 10 bibliographies and 150 words FOR NORTH DAKOTA.See Answer
  • Q12: TOPIC: Women Incarcerated Have to write in 400 words, double spaced.See Answer
  • Q13:Discussion: Integrity: From Classroom to the Workforce Listen Read the following: Geale, S.K. (2012). The ethics of disaster management. Disaster Prevention and Management, 21(4), 445-462. Retrieved from the Trident Library. National Response Framework, Fourth Edition (2019, October 28). Available from the FEMA website at https://www.fema.gov/media- library/assets/documents/117791 Pick a specific ethical concept and explain how that concept supports the fundamental doctrine in the National Response Framework for responding to disasters and emergencies. Rubrics BSHLS MSHLS MSHA Discussion grading rubric - Timeliness v1 r Engaged Partnership Paragraph G e B 3 I U A ( H 44 3 IIII < O 10 3 8 B₂ - لما K < 4 + v TA Lato (Recom... v 9 < 19px... ✔ A < > A C La Ⓡ ✔See Answer
  • Q14: INSTRUCTIONS Need to do in 3 pages in APA 7th edition for reference, Double space spacing, 12 font size and Time New Roman, and 5-6 pages with cover page and reference pages Add 2 reference minimum Module 1 Case NATIONAL RESPONSE FRAMEWORK (NRF) AND NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NIMS) Case Overview NATIONAL RESPONSE FRAMEWORK (NRF) Implementation of National Response Framework Mission Area This Implementation effort is consistent with the Presidential Policy Directive (PPD)-8. Core capabilities are the distinct elements needed to achieve the National Preparedness Goal (NPG) (See Overview of the National planning Frameworks). The Response mission area includes 14 core capabilities as follows: Planning Public Information and Warning Operational Coordination Critical Transportation Environmental Response/Health and Safety Fatality Management Services Infrastructure Systems Mass Care Services Mass Search and Rescue Operations On-Scene Security and Protection Operational Communications Public and Private Services and Resources Public Health and Medical Services Situational Assessment. NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NIMS) Command and Management: Incident Commander (IC) and Command Staff According to NIMS, the Incident Command System is responsible for the overall management of a system. The five management functions of the Incident Command System of an incident are: Incident Command - Sets the incident objectives, strategies, and priorities and has overall responsibility for the incident. Operations - Conducts operations to reach the incident objectives. Planning - Supports the incident action planning process by tracking resources, and collecting/analyzing information. Logistics - Provides resources and needed services to support the achievement of the incident objectives. Finance & Administration Monitors costs related to the incident (NIMS). DHS Law and Policy There are several laws regulating the Department of Homeland Security, the NRF and NIMS guiding principles—too many to list. See: Law and Policy, Department of Homeland Security. https://www.dhs.gov/law-and-policy Note: Module 1 Discussion will continue the theme by covering ethics and integrity. Case Assignment NRF Rank order (in order of priority) the 14 core capabilities of the NRF. From your first top three choices only, explain why you rank ordered them as such. Be specific. Explain how the United States conducts an all-hazards response in the five preparedness mission areas of prevention, protection, mitigation, response, and disaster recovery. NIMS When would a Deputy Incident Commander (Deputy IC) be necessary? Give examples. In The missing piece of NIMS: Teaching incident commanders how to function in the edge of Chaos, the author notes that first responders have to deal with a disaster situation already unfolding, and not "all the pieces fit together nicely." The author writes about the Five Tenets of Working in Chaos. Please paraphrase each one using your own words. DHS Law and Policy Go to the website Law and Policy, choose one law or policy and briefly comment on it. Be specific. Assignment Expectations Length: This Case Assignment should be 3-5 pages, not counting the title page and references. References: At least two references should be included from academic sources (e.g., peer-reviewed journal articles). Required readings are included. Quoted material should not exceed 10% of the total paper (since the focus of these assignments is critical thinking). Use your own words and build on the ideas of others. When material is copied verbatim from external sources, it MUST be enclosed in quotes. The references should be cited within the text and listed at the end of the assignment in the References section (preferably in APA format). Organization: Subheadings should be used to organize your paper according to question. Grammar and Spelling: While no points are deducted for minor errors, assignments are expected to adhere to standard guidelines of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence syntax. Points may be deducted if grammar and spelling impact clarity.See Answer
  • Q15:studentlogin.aluniv.edu/?v=28&ssid=2&cid=5#/class/320294/home/unit/4/unit-assignments v Maps Gmail Assignment Details Unit 4 - Discussion Board (75 points) Assignment Details Close Due: Tue, Mar 12 | Printer Friendly Version The need to keep correctional facilities operating in a safe and effective manner doesn't stop at locking offenders up. Incarceration management is a very important aspect of how a facility is operated. This includes the classification of Inmates because facilities have to be mindful of mixing dangerous inmates with the rest of the population. For this reason, classification levels are used. The Inmate classification levels are: 1. Minimum 2. Medium 3. Maximum Imagine you were in charge of classifying the following Inmates: #111111: committed robbery; been to prison three times; been to jail multiple times; extensive Juvenile record; never worked a real job • #222222: committed petit theft; has previous petit theft arrests; previously on probation #333333: committed murder; has no prior arrest history; college graduate and employed There are certain things that you need to consider when classifying inmates. Using the classification levels provided above, address the following: • How would you classify Inmate #111111? Why did you choose to classify this Inmate at that level? •How would you classify Inmate #222222? Why did you choose to classify this inmate at that level? • How would you classify Inmate #333333? Why did you choose to classify this inmate at that level?See Answer
  • Q16: Unit 5 - Discussion Board (75 points) Description In your own words, answer this unit's discussion questions in a main post (recommended minimum 200 words), and respond to at least 2 peers' postings (recommended minimum 75 words). After you have reviewed the Assignment Details below, click the Launch Discussion Board link under the Assignments tab for this unit to open the Discussion Board and make your post. Use these videos for help on how to post to the Discussion Board: Assignment Details Probation is a popular alternative to incarceration. There are more offenders on probation than there are inmates in prison. So what makes probation so appealing? Its popularity comes from the fact that offenders avoid jail time, it helps with decreasing prison overcrowding, and it serves a good way to deter criminal behavior in the community. One of the most important requirements of probation is that offenders comply with the terms of their probation sentence. When inmates do not comply, they are in jeopardy of having their probation revoked. This process is called a revocation hearing. Revocation hearings are important because the outcome determines what happens next for the inmate. For this discussion, answer the following: Imagine you are a probation officer preparing for a revocation hearing. Your offender has a good job and stays out of trouble. During the offenders last visit with you, they tested positive for marijuana. This is the first probation violation. What would your recommendation be for this offender at the revocation hearing and why? Discussion Board Reminders: • Must have three posts: A Main Post and two replies to peers. 。 First post: Either your main post or a reply to others must be posted before midnight CT (Central time) on Friday of each week. 。 Second and third post: Must be posted on a different day from the first post. 1/3 3/14/24, 1:27 AM Grading Rubric AIU Portal: Foundations of Corrections CRJS220 Assignment Criteria Proficient Descriptor Quality of Main Post 34 Points Total Student's main post meets or exceeds the following requirements: Responds completely to all of parts of discussion question (10 points) • Communicates content information accurately and/or logically (8 points) • Delivers a thoughtful response demonstrating insights and reflections (8 points) • Connects to key content concepts and personal experiences (if applicable) (8 points) Points /34 pts. Response to Peers 30 Points Total Responds to a minimum of 2 peers (15 points per response): • Substantive response (8 points) • Furthers the conversation with peers. Examples could include (7 points): o Provides additional resources 。 Connects accurately to key concepts 。 Shares personal or professional experiences • Contributes new information or perspective o Presents a competing viewpoint /30 pts. Support from Learning Resources 5 Points Total At least one post mentions course resources or library 75 pts. resources. Professional Writing 6 points Response is well-organized, clear, and free of grammatical and mechanical errors. 16 pts. Posts demonstrate courtesy and respect for others. Total Instructor's Comments There are no instructor comments added at this time. /75 pts. 2/3 3/14/24, 1:27 AM AIU Portal: Foundations of Corrections CRJS220 3/3See Answer
  • Q17:Instructions Need to do this work in 150 words Need to watch the movie: https://youtu.be/FZwgZteXYIE?feature=shared Adentro" we see how law is not helping Ramon Sampedro to achieve his goal. Trials are not effective, and judges don't want to listen to his allegations. Which tools did he use to convince the society -not the courts- that he is allowed to have the right to die? Would his actions exert some effect on generations to come? And would actions like his' imply possible changes in legislative systems?See Answer
  • Q18: outline or your notes from the interview along with contact information for your Gerviewee. You may make a 3-5 minute presentation about the interview, should tome allow. This assignment is due March 26. Draft 1, signed by the Writing Center is due March 21. Late papers will result in a reduction of points. PURPOSE Familiarize you with some day-to-day realities of the job • Acquaint you with jobs in the field • . Expose you to different opinions within the field • Enable you to probe the feelings about criminal justice "in the field" Improve your communication skills in an interview setting PROCEDURES Each student is to interview a professional within the criminal justice field. The person you interview may not be related to you, or someone you already know. You can choose someone from professions that include, but are not limited to the Attorneys, Judges, Law Enforcement, or any other field that works with, impacts, governs, requires or incorporates criminal laws. After you interview them, you are required to write a 3-page paper that contains that information, job outlook information and an explanation as to why or how you chose your career. It need not exceed three pages. You are to be prepared for the interview. You should have a list of questions prepared ahead of time. You can use the ones on this page or make up your own. This should be a professional interview. Please dress appropriately and conduct yourself in a professional manner. Do Not Wait until the last minute to contact someone. Call for an appointment now! Do not miss your appointment, and remember you are representing the college and the program. PRESENTATION Your presentation should be an informative one. After hearing you, I should know everything about the person's job. Do not simply outline "war stories," although you may include one or two in your presentation. Make sure that you include the person's name and position in both the presentation and summary. If you have any questions about the assignment, please ask. METHOD Open-ended interview formats allow you to begin with general questions and respond to cues from your interviewee. Below are some questions and topical areas, which are important to cover, but feel free to follow- up with questions that are more specific to elicit feelings, anecdotes, and opinions of your interviewee. You should be familiar with the questions before you begin you interview so that you can concentrate on listing the answers. You may take notes, make tapes or record responses in the manner you feel most comfortable for you. Do not record without first obtaining the interviewee's permission. The following topical areas can be included: b chill Demographics Personal a. Job Title b. Job description c. Hours and work schedule d. Salary initial, promotional, overtime e. Length of employment f. Career possibilities g. What prompted the person to choose their career? h. What is satisfying about the job? i. What is most challenging about the job? j. Would they recommend their job to others? k. What do they do for relaxation? 1. How does their job affect social or family relationships, etc.? INTERVIEW PAPERS ARE DUE MARCH 26, 2024. Be prepared to turn in your paper and present your interview. A paper received after this date will lose five (5) points per day for each day it is late. Reference Hawai Community College Below are examples of additional questions you might consider. · What are your main responsibilities as a...? What is a typical day (or week) like for you? . What do you like most about your work? . What do you like least about your work? What kinds of problems do you deal with? . What kinds of decisions do you make? What current issues and trends in the field should I know about/be aware of? • How does your position fit within the organization/career field/industry? • How does your job affect your general lifestyle? . . . How did you become interested in this field? What kinds of accomplishments tend to be valued and rewarded in this field? • How did you begin your career? What kind of education, training, or background does your job require? What skills, abilities, and personal attributes are essential to success in your job/this field? What advice would you give someone who is considering this type of job (or field)?See Answer
  • Q19:In class assignment JUST 3030 Prof. J. Remillard You are a budding legal student and you've been studying Investigative Techniques as part of your desire to work in the legal field. You kinda want to be a cop but your parents want you to be a lawyer. So, you drink. One evening, you are out with some friends at a pub. The news on the tube is splashing stories about a serial killer that is still on the loose, terrorizing the community. Your friends start commenting how the cops don't know what they're doing. "If they did, he would've been caught by now! I mean, they have witnesses and shit" "Yeah! Cops can do whatever they want, they're just lazy, is what." "I agree. How difficult can it be with all the tools they have, Jesus! They have the bodies, the crime scenes, let's go already!" You look at your friends and try to recall how you got bunched in with these guys (Although you could draw some insight from your Crim. Theory I studies...) You know you shoulda stayed in to study instead of going out for some drinks... So, you get annoyed a little and decide its time you explain to them how the real investigative world works, the legality of things, the advancement of technology and the restrictions placed upon the police and the history of wrongful convictions, etc. You thought you better start now before everyone gets too drunk. So, you go: "Hey, guys, hold on for a sec... let me tell you something!" Assignment: In 500 to 750 words, double-spaced, no APA, no title page (unless you can't help yourself), no need to reference but you may quote if you wish (must cite if you do...), explain to your friends what you've learned so far and how even with all the technologies and knowledge, they must follow certain investigative rules and work within the law so that the wrong person doesn't get convicted. You tell 'em!! Mention as many technical, legal and research points thus far discussed in class to support your speech, examples, etc. But it must be like a fireside chat, beer-laden and somewhat dummed down for your friends. A prose, if you will, much like Plato did when speaking of love. Of course, any spelling mistakes will be overlooked due to your intoxication. Weight: 10%See Answer
  • Q20: Module 2 - Case U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) Case Assignment DHS and Points of DOD Involvement Command and Control in the Homeland (C2) What is meant by a bottom-up approach? Shouldn't those with more knowledge and authority be in command? Four C2 options are available to our military and civilian leadership. What are they? Paraphrase. Give example of each. Department of Defense Support to Domestic Incidents At what point would the military be involved in a terrorist attack? Give example. Use citations to back up your statements. DHS Website: Locate the Five Homeland Security Missions. Which mission(s) would DOD be involved? Give examples. Assignment Expectations Length: This Case Assignment should be 3-5 pages, not counting the title page and references. References: At least two references should be included from academic sources (e.g., peer-reviewed journal articles). Required readings are included. Quoted material should not exceed 10% of the total paper (since the focus of these assignments is critical thinking). Use your own words and build on the ideas of others. When material is copied verbatim from external sources, it MUST be enclosed in quotes. The references should be cited within the text and listed at the end of the assignment in the References section (preferably in APA format). Organization: Subheadings should be used to organize your paper according to question. Grammar and Spelling: While no points are deducted for minor errors, assignments are expected to adhere to standard guidelines of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence syntax. Points may be deducted if grammar and spelling impact clarity. Just an FYI for the course - this is how I read and grade papers. 1. I open the file and go directly to the bibliography in the reference section. Going there first shows me the research foundation upon which you have built your paper. A solid research foundation will have a combination of data types. • • • Government sources (these are used to explain programs and define the scope and the intent of policy) Professional sources like on line web pages. These provide access to subject matter expertise who write based on perspective and experience. They are also business/profit driven which means they can promote a specific point of view. Peer reviewed data - these are research documents that have large bibliographies that show you where the author(s) have found data upon which they have built their hypothesis. EVERY PAPER IN THIS CLASS REQUIRES AT LEAST TWO PEER REVIEWED SOURCES, BOTH THE CASE AND SLP. 2. Next I read the paper to see if you have addressed each of the questions posed in the written assignment ⚫ This should be the most simple point of analysis. If there are three questions, there should be three sections in your paper, one for each question. 3. Lastly, I assess for critical thinking - this is where you as a student get to display how you think! • The academic articles that are peer reviewed are often the foundation of this assessment. Critical thinking doesn't mean being critical of things, but rather being curious. Do you accept things as they are or question if something is missing, or the wrong measurement is being employed? Do you wonder if it's too good to be true? You can display critical thinking in just a few sentences, so I look for it somewhere in your paper.See Answer

TutorBin Testimonials

I found TutorBin Criminal Law homework help when I was struggling with complex concepts. Experts provided step-wise explanations and examples to help me understand concepts clearly.

Rick Jordon

5

TutorBin experts resolve your doubts without making you wait for long. Their experts are responsive & available 24/7 whenever you need Criminal Law subject guidance.

Andrea Jacobs

5

I trust TutorBin for assisting me in completing Criminal Law assignments with quality and 100% accuracy. Experts are polite, listen to my problems, and have extensive experience in their domain.

Lilian King

5

I got my Criminal Law homework done on time. My assignment is proofread and edited by professionals. Got zero plagiarism as experts developed my assignment from scratch. Feel relieved and super excited.

Joey Dip

5

Popular Subjects for criminal law

You can get the best rated step-by-step problem explanations from 65000+ expert tutors by ordering TutorBin criminal law homework help.

TutorBin helping students around the globe

TutorBin believes that distance should never be a barrier to learning. Over 500000+ orders and 100000+ happy customers explain TutorBin has become the name that keeps learning fun in the UK, USA, Canada, Australia, Singapore, and UAE.