health assessment and wellness and community health homework help

Boost your journey with 24/7 access to skilled experts, offering unmatched health assessment and wellness and community health homework help

Trusted by 1.1 M+ Happy Students

4.4Trust Pilot

4.4Edu Reviewer

5App Review

4.8Student

WhatsApp Support

Get Instant
Online Homework Help
via WhatsApp

Get instant homework help from top tutors—just a WhatsApp message away. 24/7 hw help support for all your academic needs!

★★★★★

2M+ students trust TutorBin

Your WhatsApp Number

⚡ Instant reply

🔒 100% private

👨‍🏫 Top tutors

🌍 All subjects

^*Get instant homework help from top tutors—just a WhatsApp message away. 24/7 support for all your academic needs!

2M+ Students Helped24/7 Live SupportExpert TutorsAll Subjects CoveredInstant Response100% ConfidentialTop Rated ServiceMoney-back Guarantee2M+ Students Helped24/7 Live SupportExpert TutorsAll Subjects CoveredInstant Response100% ConfidentialTop Rated ServiceMoney-back Guarantee

Recently Asked health assessment and wellness and community health Questions

Expert help when you need it

Q1: Assignment 1 Select and complete one of the four assignment options listed below. Format Each assignment should be seven to ten pages long (about 1800-2500 words), 12-point font, double-spaced. Use APA style to list and cite all sources used. Include a title page and reference list (not counted in the seven to ten pages required). K Note that you are not asked to format the entire paper in APA style; you are only using APA style to list your references and cite them in the paper. There are many online tools to help you with this. Grading The important thing is to cover your topic as thoroughly as needed to give a reader a complete picture of the issue. It's a good idea to ask a friend or family member to review your work and alert you to any information gaps-their questions show you what essential content you've left out. Your Academic Expert will, if necessary, correct and comment on grammar and spelling, but recommendations of this type are intended to help you improve your writing skills. Grades (marks) will be based mainly on the content of your work. Listed below are the primary criteria that will be used to evaluate your essay: Relevance: Does the essay pertain to the chosen topic? Definition and precision of terms: Have you clearly stated the meaning of the terms used and used them consistently throughout the assignment? Use of evidence: Do you support arguments with evidence from reliable sources? Accuracy of information: Have you made a clear distinction between supportable facts and your own opinions? Logical consistency: Are your conclusions supported by the evidence in your paper? ● ● ● ● Finding and Using Information Unit 3 talks about how to interpret information in the area of CAM. Here is additional information on how to search for sources and critically evaluate what you read. This is essential if you are to produce quality assignments. An excellent source of information for doing fast literature searches is the PubMed website, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/, published by the US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health. However, the great majority of papers generated via this website only allow you to read the abstract, not the whole paper. Start your search by clicking on the Journal Titles tab and entering the name of the journal in which the article appears in the Search box. Here are useful websites for the assignments: Mayo Clinic: www.mayoclinic.com page 1 ● ● MedlinePlus: http://medlineplus.gov/ National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health: https://nccih.nih.gov/ Evaluating What You Read When you write your assignments, you will have to gather information from various sources such as journals or the Internet. Some of the information that you come across will be reliable, while much may be lacking in credibility. It is essential that you carefully evaluate what you read and determine its reliability. Here are some of the factors you need to consider: 1. Is the author an expert? Is the author qualified to write on the subject? Is the author a credible and unbiased source of information? Consider the following people who have written an article that tells you about herb X and whether it has any value as a remedy for arthritis: Dr A is a professor of medicine at a university. Mr B is described as an "expert on natural treatments." Which has more credibility? 2. What method was used to obtain data or conduct research? If this is a report of a research study, was it carried out on rats, samples in a test tube, or people with a disease? If the results are based on actual subjects with a disease, then was the study based on anecdotal observations or was it a clinical trial using a double-blind procedure with several dozen subjects? Does it appear that the conclusion is reasonable based on the data provided? 3. Where was the information published? The article you read about herb X and its possible value as a remedy for arthritis was published in a scholarly journal? published in a magazine you obtained at a health food shop? attached to a website for a company that sells supplements? ● 4. What type of audience is the author writing to? Is this article written for the general public, for health professionals, or perhaps for some other group? 5. Is the article written in a scientific way? The author states that this latest study confirms several previous studies that were published in credible medical journals. References to those articles are given. versus The author states that "herb X speeds detoxification and stimulates the immune system." No references are given. page 2 Many times it is obvious whether the article is based on legitimate science or junk science. But often figuring it out can be quite challenging: you will have to look for subtle clues. Carefully evaluate the articles you read based on the above factors. Look at the whole story before drawing a conclusion. There are three excellent guidelines to follow: 1. If the claims seem too good to be true, they probably are. 2. If the person making the claims makes a profit by persuading you to buy a product, then be doubly dubious. 3. If the article includes statements that are contrary to accepted scientific principles, then the claims that are made are unlikely to be factual. Questions to Ask Yourself about Your Review of Literature 1. Have I formulated a specific thesis or research question that my literature review helps to provide information on? 2. What is the scope of my literature review? What types of publications am I using (e.g., journals, books, government documents, popular media)? What discipline am I working in (e.g., nursing, psychology, medicine)? 3. Has my search been wide enough to ensure that I have properly covered the topic? Have I just taken the first two or three articles I happened to come across and assumed that these represent the literature on the subject? Has my search been narrow enough to exclude irrelevant material? Is the number of sources I've used appropriate for the length of my paper? 4. Have I discussed the strengths and weaknesses of the cited material? Have I critically analyzed the literature I cited? Or have I merely summarized articles? 5. Have I cited and discussed studies contrary to my perspective? 6. Will the reader find my literature review relevant and appropriate? 7. Have I succeeded in showing that I recognize relevant information? Have I explained its relevance to the particular topic, and carried out a critical appraisal? The goal is not necessarily to get to “the truth.” With many questions, the answer may be unambiguously "This claim (or theory of proposed treatment) is clearly wrong." But many other times a more reasonable conclusion may be along these lines: "The evidence does not allow a firm conclusion. On balance the claims being made may be correct, but more research is required." Often, different experts may read the same evidence and come to very different opinions. The crucial goal you must aim for is to review the literature and draw carefully balanced conclusions that stand up to scrutiny. It is quite okay not to reach a "true/false" or "yes/no" conclusion. Please complete only one of the following four assignment options: Option 1: Critical Book Appraisal If you choose to complete Option 1, write a critical appraisal of a book that you have recently read concerning one or more particular complementary and alternative medical therapies currently practised in Canada. The book you review should be at least 100 pages in length. You should include the following sections: page 3 1. Author(s). Provide information about the author(s), including credentials and academic, organizational, or institutional affiliation. Does the author have a bias or vested interest? 2. Introduction. What is the book about? 3. Claims. Does the book make any claims about treatment? 4. Supporting evidence. What scientific evidence does the author present to support his or her claims? Assess the literature in detail. Critically assess the research in relation to the book content. 5. Risks and benefits. Discuss and critically assess the risks and/or benefits associated with the particular therapy presented in the book. 6. Conclusion. Present your conclusion. 7. References. List and cite all sources of scientific literature that you used to write this assignment using APA style. Option 2: CAM and Conventional Therapies If you choose to complete Option 2, investigate the ways in which various complementary and alternative medical therapies can be blended with conventional medicine to treat one of the following conditions: arthritis, menopause, migraine, obesity, insomnia, depression, back pain, or irritable bowel syndrome. You should include the following sections: 1. Condition. Define and describe the condition. 2. Conventional treatment. Describe the current conventional medical treatment. 3. Complementary and alternative treatment. Discuss and critically assess the CAM therapies proposed to treat the condition. 4. Combined treatment. Suggest how conventional and CAM therapies could be blended. 5. Risks and benefits. Assess the risks and/or benefits of combining conventional and CAM therapies. 6. Conclusions. Present your conclusions. 7. References. List and cite all sources that you used to write this assignment using APA style. Option 3: A Dietary Supplement If you choose to complete Option 3, write a paper on an herbal or dietary supplement that is not included in units of the Study Guide commentary, and that is used as a form of complementary and alternative medical therapy. You should include the following sections. 1. Background. Describe the background and historical use of the herb or dietary supplement. 2. Dosage. Describe the dosage, methods of use, and form of the herb or dietary supplement. 3. Benefits. Discuss the proponent's claims of benefits of the herb or dietary supplement. page 4 4. Contraindications. Discuss the contraindications for particular individuals and for particular conditions. 5. Research. Describe and critically assess the research that evaluated the effectiveness of the herb or dietary supplement. 6. Recommendations. Present your recommendations for use of the herb or dietary supplement. 7. References. List and cite all sources that you used to write this assignment using APA style. Option 4: A Complementary and/or Alternative Therapy If you choose to complete Option 4, evaluate a complementary and alternative medical therapy that is not included in the units of the Study Guide commentary. You should include the following sections: 1. Background. Describe the background and historical use of the CAM therapy. 2. Methods and training. Describe the methods of the CAM therapy and the training of the practitioners of this therapy. 3. Benefits. Discuss the proponents' claims of benefits of this CAM therapy. 4. Contraindications. Discuss the contraindications for particular individuals and for particular conditions. 5. Research. Describe and critically assess the research that evaluated the effectiveness of this therapy. 6. Recommendations. Present your recommendations for use of this therapy. 7. References. List and cite all sources that you used to write this assignment using APA style. page 5See Answer
Q2: Chapter 3: Draft Chapter 3: Draft Purpose This assignment will help you learn to propose strategies that improve organizational sustainability using health information data. Synopsis For this assignment, you will begin work on Prospectus Chapter 3 and discuss methodologies for solving the problem/question that you have identified. This assignment is not a rigorous or true-to-form research methodology section. Nevertheless, it simulates the thought process of synthesizing what you have learned in your background and literature review to target a specific source for data collection in an effort to answer a research question or uncover information about a research statement. Drawing on the reading assignments in this course, propose at least three strategies around information governance, data analysis, strategies for organizational sustainability, or data visualization methods to research and integrate with your dissertation problem or topic. As Roberts (2010) points out, the "methodology selection rests primarily on the (1) problem to be investigated, (2) purpose of the study, (3) theory base, and (4) nature of the data." Your choice of methodology must be supported through your review of the literature and be appropriate to tackle the problem you identified. You may benefit from reviewing the following resources to prepare: • Roberts (2010), Chapter 12 • The Electronic Theses and Dissertation Center (https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_olink/r/1501/1) • Literature Review: Getting Started (https://guides.franklin.edu/LITREVIEW) • Literature Reviews: An Overview for Graduate Students (https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=t2d7y_r65HU) Prepare, Research, Draft Prepare Reflect on your previous work in this course and be ready to provide a brief update and overview of your completed work. This will serve as your rationale for the method chosen to collect more data on your 1/5 problem beyond the literature review. Research Using the textbook, course resources, and library databases, become familiar with research methods (methodologies) or techniques that you can access to gather more information on the specific problem or topic. Every course in your doctoral program is designed to support your dissertation either through new content knowledge or concepts that support your research question analysis. All of your papers in this class should be NEW and not contain substantial portions of previously submitted work in other courses. Use RefWorks to organize your resources. If you decide not to use a resource for this part of the prospectus, keep it, as it may be valuable later on. Draft Refer to the Graduate Research Paper Writing Guide. (https://franklin.instructure.com/courses/15037/files/2240970?wrap=1) For Chapter 3, include the following sections: Chapter 3: Draft 1. Introduction: Summarize the following elements from your work in this course: a. The research problem/question from Chapter 1. What have you learned about your research problem/question? b. The key literature review information related to the research problem/question. c. The applicable patient or population of the study and their needs. 2. Methodology: Identify the methodology you would select. Keep in mind that this is a hypothetical approach (you will not be doing any testing), but this still must be a reasonable method based on the variables selected and research question to be answered. 3. Research Design: State the research design you would select to support your selection. Refer to Roberts (2010), Chapter 12 for an example of how to describe a research design. 4. Data Collection: Develop a table that displays all possible sources (not references) that will aid in answering your research questions (people, positions, databases, locations, etc.). See the example table below. Source John Smith, CEO, Important Healthcare Corporation Instrumentation Connection Personal interview John Smith has been a leader in the field of my research question for 15 years. He has agreed to a personal interview to discuss my research question. 2/5 100 Clients at National Urgent Healthcare Inc. Survey Healthcare Chapter 3: Draft Chapter 3: Draft Over 1000 clients at Urgent Healthcare, Inc. are dealing with the issue I am researching. I will use a survey published by National Healthcare to find out how successfully they are dealing with my research question. Out of 1000 clients, I expect to a return of 100. a. Make sure to connect your data sources and methods to your research questions and/or statements from the previous section. b. For each source listed in the table, which data collection method will aid in the collection (i.e. surveys, focus, groups, observation, meta-analysis of public works, etc.)? c. Address this section as if an expert panel will review the instrumentation. 5. References: cite all sources for this section. Submission Instructions 1. Submit your assignment to Turnitin. Give yourself enough time to revise and resubmit ahead of the due date. 2. By the due date indicated, upload your final work to Turnitin. Grading Criteria Read the assignment rubric to understand how your work will be assessed. 3/5 Criteria Introduction Methodology Research Design Data Collection Critical Thinking 9 to >8.0 pts Proficient Summary of the research problem/question and description of learning is comprehensive; key literature review is comprehensive and related to the research problem/question; applicable patient or population/needs are comprehensive. 9 to >8.0 pts Proficient Methodology is comprehensive and supported by sophisticated research. 9 to >8.0 pts Proficient Research design is comprehensive and supported by sophisticated research. 9 to >8.0 pts Proficient Table displays comprehensive sources, instrumentation, and connections. 9 to >8.0 pts Proficient Demonstrates critical analysis of all cited material by drawing reasonable conclusions. Ratings 8 to >7.0 pts Acceptable Chapter 3: Draft Summary of the research problem/question and description of learning is adequate; key literature review is adequate and related to the research problem/question; applicable patient or population/needs are adequate. 8 to >7.0 pts Acceptable Methodology is adequate and supported by fundamental research. 8 to >7.0 pts Acceptable Research design is adequate and supported by fundamental research. 8 to >7.0 pts Acceptable Table displays adequate sources, instrumentation, and connections. 8 to >7.0 pts Acceptable Demonstrates critical analysis of some cited material by drawing reasonable conclusions. 7 to >0 pts Unacceptable Summary of the research problem/question is insufficient and/or description of learning is insufficient or vague; or key literature review is insufficient or unrelated to the research problem/question; or applicable patient or population/needs are insufficient. 7 to >0 pts Unacceptable Methodology is insufficient, vague, or not supported by research. 7 to >0 pts Unacceptable Research design is insufficient, vague, or not supported by research. 7 to >0 pts Unacceptable Table displays insufficient sources, instrumentation, or connections. 7 to >0 pts Unacceptable Does not demonstrate critical analysis of cited material by drawing reasonable conclusions. Pts 9 pts 9 pts 9 pts 9 pts 9 pts 4/5 Criteria Doctoral Level Writing APA Formatting 9 to >8.0 pts Proficient Demonstrates doctoral writing in all categories of spelling, grammar, sentence structure, and logical organization of the paper. 6 to >5.0 pts Proficient Applies all APA rules in format, citations, and references. Ratings 8 to >7.0 pts Acceptable Chapter 3: Draft Demonstrates doctoral writing in most categories of spelling, grammar, sentence structure, and logical organization of the paper. 5 to >4.0 pts Acceptable Applies most APA rules in format, citations, and references. 7 to >0 pts Unacceptable Does not demonstrate doctoral writing in all categories of spelling, grammar, sentence structure, and logical organization of the paper. 4 to >0 pts Unacceptable Does not adequately apply APA rules in format, citations, and references. Pts 9 pts 6 pts Total Points: 60 5/5See Answer
Q3:ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS NEED TO MAKE 10 PPT Slides Make a powerpoint presentation "WITH SPEAKER NOTES* on the topic: "Bariatrics in Sub-Acute Care Settings" *THIS IS AN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY BASED POWERPOINT *USE THE PPT TEMPLATE FILE AS A GUIDE * The completed presentation should include: A. A structured presentation of the subject matter that focuses on: o Introduction the of topic and OT's role related to condition/modality/specialty/approach o Adult older adult populations commonly impacted/benefited by the condition/ modality/specialty/approach o The specific scope of OT's practice for the condition/ modality/specialty/approach o Frame(s) of reference that guides OT's role for this condition/modality/specialty/approach o Describe the rationale for selecting one or two assessment tools that can be used effectively within the context of your presentation topic (the condition/ modality/specialty/approach) o Roles, routines, habits, and occupations impacted by this condition/ modality/specialty/ approach o Contraindications or safety precautions related to the condition/modality/specialty/approach B. Role of the occupational therapy practitioner within the interprofessional and consultative process, need for specialist referral within the interdisciplinary team related to this topic. C. Reference list using APA 7th edition format (inserted at end of presentation). IV. Deliver the presentation with digital storytelling software. Audio-visual aids must be appropriate for the topic presented. V. Students may not use any prepared education handouts/instruction sheets (published or clinic-based). Helpful Hints: • Keep written or oral information concise, brief, and easy to follow while including sufficient detail for adequate execution of the presentation (this is easier said than done sometimes!). •The presentation needs to be a minimum of 10 minutes in length and should allow for 5 minutes for questions; a maximum of 15 minutes will be allowed for the presentation. Grading Criteria: • Terminology is clear and appropriate for the audience. • Students will effectively interact through various way of communication (written, oral, and non-verbal) in a professional manner. •Presentation of instructional materials is professional, appropriate to audience, understandable, easy to follow. • Presenters maintain contact with the audience and do not read from slides. •Project is adequately supported by professional references and are evidence-based. • Project includes effective structure and organization.See Answer
Q4: Hallmark Assignment: Community Project: PowerPoint Presentation The Hallmark Assignment is a culmination of the Community Needs Assessment worksheets you have completed. Worksheets #1 (Community Assessment), #2 (Prevention Education Proposal) and #3 (Disaster Preparedness Assessment) are templates to help guide your final project. O ■ Develop a PowerPoint presentation with a minimum of 20 slides (not including the title slide or reference slides). Place key points on the slides (maximum 8 words, 5 lines). May include graphs and images. Include detailed presenter (speaker) notes for each slide. Full sentences and in-text citations using APA 7th edition are required. Attached are worksheets for the project as a guide. I live in Tracy, California. San Joaquin countySee Answer
Q5: University of Chester Module title Module code Assessment task title Submission deadline for assessment Summary of assessment task Word limit and guidance on submission Weighting Feedback and provisional marks release date Learning outcomes that will be assessed In-module support opportunities including formative feedback Assessment Brief Independent Project FP3003 Individual Poster Presentation Turnitin: Mon 19th February 2024, 1pm Delivery: Mon 26th February to Fri 1st March, 2024 Create a poster showing the planning process of your Independent Project. 1.650 words on poster (upper limit 715) 2. File name: Your Assessment (J) Number 3. File type: PowerPoint (.ppt / .pptx) or PDF (.pdf) This assessment task comprises 30% of the overall mark for this module. Marking criteria are provided at the end of this document. Friday 22nd March LO1 Identify a key area of their undergraduate degree subject and plan an academic essay. LO4 Present a poster that outlines research undertaken and offers an academic approach for the development of the project topic. Students can email one draft to their lecturer no later than 7 days before the deadline (unless lecturer specifies otherwise), and receive general feedback comments on the work. See Assessment Tile in Moodle for more support resources and materials. If you require support with your assessment, please contact: Guidance on the completion of the assessment task Create a poster showing the planning process of your Independent Project. Things to include: ● ● ● ● ● ● ● What not to do: ● Contact your timetabled module lecturer: Ged Turner (g.turner@chester.ac.uk) Chris Cavanagh (c.cavanagh@chester.ac.uk) Janet Taylor (janet.taylor@chester.ac.uk) Alan Cheng (a.cheng@chester.ac.uk) Veronica Miller (v.miller@chester.ac.uk) Darren Poole (d.poole@chester.ac.uk) Nick Hitchcock (n.hitchcock@chester.ac.uk) Jacquie Banks (jacqueline.banks@chester.ac.uk) Naomi Walker (n.walker@chester.ac.uk) Caroline Magill (c.magill@chester.ac.uk) ● Specifications the main ideas / theories / concepts that your Project is based on background information and key facts critical commentary where applicable figures / visual data / images where appropriate important references and sources that you plan to use present a structured plan of your Project essay give a timeline of what you did Presentation including Q&A will last 10 minutes. The poster will be made in PowerPoint and screen-shared through Teams. Your spoken information and poster should complement each other. You can arrange and design the poster however you wish, provided that it is clear and easy to follow. The presentation should not exceed 650 words. Main text font size 12-16 - titles and headings can be larger; list of references can be smaller ● ● Content (visual and spoken) should be clearly understandable for a general audience, with accurate APA referencing on the poster. All references should be constructed using the APA referencing system. The departmental Quick Guide is available at USS Moodle here. Further information and guidelines on referencing is available from Cite ThemRight (click here). You will need to click 'Login' and choose Chester as your institution. Guide to using CiteThemRight is available here. Use of Artificial Intelligence (Al) Tools For this assessment task, you are not permitted to use artificial intelligence tools in accordance with the following guidance: It is expected that your writing will conform to standard Academic English in terms of spelling, grammar, punctuation and style. *A small number of students with approved deferrals may present later than the stated period. ● While preparing this assessment, you may not use any Al tools except for those tools linked to spelling, punctuation, and grammar (e.g., Grammarly, Draft Coach). The University Academic Conduct Policy explains how students are expected to take responsibility for the fair presentation of the contents of any work they present for assessment. This includes acknowledging the use of Artificial Intelligence tools. Breaching the academic conduct policy can have serious penalties. Issues regarding submission Submission procedure The assignment must be submitted electronically to the assigned Turnitin submission inbox on the Moodle module page via the University of Chester Portal before 1pm on the due date. • Any late submissions will result in a 5-mark Late Work Penalty per 24 hours. • Any submissions over seven days late will not be marked and result in a zero. If a deferral is approved (see below), you will submit at the next assessment opportunity. Submissions must consist of .pdf or PowerPoint (.ppt or .pptx) files. If you have problems uploading, it is advised that you save the final piece as a .pdf and submit the .pdf to Turnitin. Submissions in the wrong file type will not be processed or marked. If Turnitin does not accept your submission because it is the wrong file type, this will not be an acceptable reason for mitigation (Section 7.3 of the Assessment Regulations). Delivery procedure and lateness Please be available on Teams in time for your scheduled presentation slot. Your assessor will call you into a group video call, in which you will need to have your camera switched on and be able to screen-share your PowerPoint poster. The assessment will be video-recorded for monitoring purposes. No student will be permitted to deliver their presentation after the lapse of half an hour from their scheduled presentation time. If your assessor cannot reach you on Teams, you will be deemed not to be in attendance and shall be awarded a 0 for the presentation. Extensions, Deferrals and Assessment Regulations You can find details about self-certifying for a seven-day extension to an assessment deadline, the evidence needed to be granted a longer extension due to exceptional circumstances and the online application system for these on the Registry Information for Students Portal Page by clicking on the Exceptional Circumstances tile. You can find out more about University regulations related to assessment from the Registry Information for Students Portal Page by clicking on the Assessment Regulations tile. Cognitive Skills Structure and reasoning Selection and use of information Communicatio n Skills Spelling, punctuation and grammar. Academic integrity Use of academic English. 90-100 Exemplary organisation of ideas and structure. Consistently exemplary reasoning. Exemplary use of information with exemplary use of relevant references and wider sources of information; closely linked and integrated. 90-100 Exemplary spelling, punctuation and grammar throughout. All sources acknowledged; referencing and citation could not be further improved. Consistently exemplary leve of academic English / use of terminology. Highly coherent and exemplary standard of oral and/or written communication. 80-89 Outstanding organisation of ideas; outstanding structure; thoughtful and coherent reasoning. Outstanding use of information; use of relevant references and wider sources of information integrated throughout. 80-89 Outstanding accuracy with spelling, punctuation and grammar throughout. Any errors rare and trivial. All sources acknowledged; referencing and citation to an outstanding standard. Outstanding level of academic English / use of terminology; highly coherent with rare and trivial errors; outstanding standard of oral and/or written communication. 70-79 Excellent organisation of ideas; excellent structure; excellent and coherent reasoning. Excellent use of information; excellent breadth of materials selected. Excellent use of relevant references consistently throughout. 70-79 Excellent spelling, punctuation and grammar for the majority of the work. All sources acknowledged; referencing and citation to an excellent standard. Excellent level of academic English / use of terminology; coherent with occasional lapses in accuracy or style. Excellent standard of oral and/or written communication. 60-69 Strong organisation of ideas; logical structure; well- reasoned discussion; strong and coherent reasoning. Strong use of information and breadth of material; strong integration of references. 60-69 Strong standard of spelling, punctuation and grammar for the majority of the work. Sources acknowledged; referencing and citation to a strong standard; with occasional/ minor inaccuracies. Strong level of academic English / use of terminology; mostly coherent with some lapses in accuracy or style. Strong standard of oral and/or written communication. 50-59 Good organisation of ideas; comprehensible structure; good reasoning. Good use of information; limited consideration of alternative views or perspectives with good use of relevant references. 50-59 Good standard of spelling, punctuation and grammar for the majority of the work. Sources acknowledged; referencing and citation present to a good standard with some inaccuracies. Good communication skills; variable use of academic English / terminology; generally coherent. Good standard of oral and/or written communication. 40-49 Satisfactory organisation of ideas; basic principles of structure evident; satisfactory reasoning. Satisfactory use of information; superficial information with some integrated references. 40-49 Satisfactory spelling, punctuation and grammar; Some persistent errors. Sources generally acknowledged to a satisfactory level; errors / omissions in reference list or in-text citation. Displays satisfactory communication skills; some use of academic style / terminology; generally coherent. Satisfactory standard of oral and/or written communication. 30-39 Insufficient organisation of ideas; limitations to structure; lack of reasoning. Insufficient use of or information; few relevant references used. 30-39 Frequent errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar, Insufficient clarity some places. Insufficient acknowledgeme nt of sources; omission of reference list or in-text citation; paraphrasing. Displays some communication skills; insufficient use of academic English / terminology; variable coherence. In sufficient standard of oral and/or written communication. 20-29 Little clear organisation of ideas; unclear or incomplete structure; limited reasoning. Little use of relevant information or materials; very few relevant references used. 20-29 Frequent errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar, little clarity in many places. Significant omission of reference list and little accurate in-text citation. Displays basic communication skills; little use of academic English / terminology; limited coherence. Poor standard of oral and/or written communication. 10-19 Negligible presentation of ideas; very unclear structure; negligible evidence of reasoning. Negligible use of information and negligible relevant references used. 10-19 Frequent and significant errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar; generally negligible clarity throughout. Negligible acknowledgeme nt of sources in any form. Negligible communication skills; no use of academic English / terminology; very limited coherence; extremely unclear oral and/or written communication. 0-9 No or virtually no organisation of ideas; no or virtually no recognisable structure. No or virtually no evidence of reasoning. No or virtually no use of information. No or virtually no relevant references used. 0-9 Frequent significant errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar, significantly damaging clarity throughout. No or virtually no acknowledgeme nt of sources in any form. No or virtually no display of general communication skills or use of academic English / terminology; incoherent and incomplete work. Incoherent oral and/or written communication.See Answer
Q6: Annotated bibliography tips Pick a topic. Read research articles on your topic from different disciplinary perspectives. When you search for articles, use disciplinary words like "economic, cultural, social, geographic, psychological, political”. For example: Spinosa, J., Christiansen, P., Dickson, J. M., Lorenzetti, V., & Hardman, C. A. (2019). From socioeconomic disadvantage to obesity: the mediating role of psychological distress and emotional eating. Obesity, 27(4), 559-564 • Kadouh, H. C., & Acosta, A. (2017). Current paradigms in the etiology of obesity. Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 19(1), 2-11. ● Biener, A. I., Cawley, J., & Meyerhoefer, C. (2020). The medical care costs of obesity and severe obesity in youth: An instrumental variables approach. Health economics, 29(5), 624-639. Pick three articles Research articles from good quality sources not news articles, editorials or web site postings If the article is too difficult to understand, pick a different one. Articles don't have to be related - your purpose is to compare and contrast the different types of knowledge that they contribute to study of this topic. Summarize and add your comments Summarize the article and main findings in your own words – don't copy large amounts of text from the article (but if you do quote the article, remember to use proper in-text citation) After you summarize the article, add your own comments about: how this is the same or different from the perspective of other articles, why it is important to the body of knowledge (or not), • or anything new or unexpected that it adds to your own understanding of the topic Each entry in the bibliography should be 150-200 words ● Nimmerblit, Griselda. "Flower Images in Fairy Tales since World War II." Criticism in Contemporary Folk Narratives 9.4 (1989): 71-89. Print. Nimmerblit examines the significance of floral imagery in five different contemporary fairy tales. She argues that flowers have taken on an increasing importance in fairy stories since the end of World War II as a means of countering the "real world suburban sprawl that has occurred during the same time period" (72). Wildflowers in particular are used to evoke a Golden Age when humankind and nature existed in perfect harmony. Nimmerblit uses logical arguments to support her ideas, which are rooted in the Paleo-Verdo theory developed by the Greenman Folklorists. She also establishes some very plausible linkages between her research and the Paleo- Verdo-Jaundoists' theory of weed envy, making this article of great interest to scholars in both schools of thought. Properly cites quoted text from the article. Complete citation in a recognized citation style (MLA) Briefly summarizes the main thrust of the article https://wiki.ubc.ca/Library: How to Write an Annotated Bibliography Critical assessment of the article's quality as well as its overall usefulness to scholarship in the field Brevity-sticks to ideal 10 sentence maximum, and under 150 words. HS 200 - please use APA 6 or 7 Ideal 200 words HS 200- you are asked to compare this article to the others (similarities and differences) and assess what it adds to body of knowledge on the topic./n Prior to beginning this assignment, students will select a health issue that they are interested in analyzing – for example, obesity. Students may select a topic from a list provided, or select a different topic (in discussion with the instructor). Some suggested topics: • chronic pain • dementia • substance use • health outcomes of violence/injury • chronic diseases (arthritis, diabetes, asthma, etc) health problems of aging depression For this assignment, students will create an annotated bibliography of three good quality research articles, each looking at their topic from a different disciplinary perspective (biology/medicine, psychology, sociology, geography, anthropology, economics, etc). For this assignment, students are asked to provide a proper bibliographic reference for each selected article and summarize in one paragraph (in their own words) the main argument and pertinent findings of the article. At the conclusion of the paragraph, students will compare each article to the other two articles and reflect briefly on the differences or unique perspectives that this article introduces to knowledge about this topic. Success indicators Learning outcomes ● Students will begin to find and access information on health studies topics from a variety of good quality sources Students will assemble and synthesize multiple ideas ● ● ● ● Students will identify relevant and appropriate sources for their assignment Students will show a good understanding of source materials and summarize clearly and coherently in their own words Learning outcome: Students will begin to find and access Students will connect their sources to broader themes and ideas in their topic and reflect on changes in their own understanding of this topic information on health studies topics from a variety of good quality sources Good ● Student selects sources that relate to their chosen topic Student selects a variety of sources Student selects information from appropriate sources and locations Satisfactory sources are not clearly related to the topic lacks a variety of sources information mainly from convenient, non- academic sources and does not make use of research strategies Unsatisfactory • sources are poor quality and/or not appropriate for the topic or the assignment ● Student selects information from inappropriate locations HS 200 Lori Latta Students will assemble and synthesize multiple ideas Summary of the article shows good understanding and ability to identify and rephrase key points. Student establishes and examines connections between their sources and broader ideas in their topic, and among different sources. Summary shows some understanding and ability to summarize key points with minimal repetition of descriptive details. Student provides a superficial analysis of connections between their source and broader ideas and themes Summary is mainly repetition of article's content with no attempt or weak attempt to identify and rephrase key points. One of my favourite sources for APA referencing is Douglas College: https://guides.douglascollege.ca/APA-7 This is what an annotated bibliography entry looks like: Student does not examine connections between their sources and broader ideas, or among their different sources All referencing must follow APA 7 guidelines. See the U of R library website for APA guidelines https://library.uregina.ca/introapa. Koesling, D., Kieselbach, K., & Bozzaro, C. (2019). Chronic pain and society. Pain, 33, 220-225. Koesling and colleagues' article discusses chronic pain using a sociological perspective. They argue that although chronic pain is a global problem, groups are affected differently depending on their ethnicity, gender, age, and socioeconomic status. Their findings indicate women and people of poverty are more likely to suffer from the condition. Furthermore, how people are affected by and deal with chronic pain is closely related to the social framework provided to the individual. Finally, they have found that how society, and its medical system, interprets pain can promote the development of chronic pain. They conclude by suggesting that medicine cannot address all of the problems of chronic pain; socio-political measures also need consideration. A sociological perspective discovers how interactions can exacerbate or alleviate how people experience chronic pain, which is crucial for the body of knowledge for influencing and implementing public policies. This perspective does focus on variables similar to the epidemiological paper; however, it places more attention on societal structures, behavioural factors, and power relations, which allows them to examine how inequity affects chronic pain.See Answer
Q7:Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you. Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described. Post an evaluation topic and a brief description of the evaluation. Discuss how social determinants impact this issue./nThe Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy- making. A critical component of any policy design is evaluation of the results. How comfortable are you with the thought of becoming involved with such matters? Some nurses may be hesitant to get involved with policy evaluation. The preference may be to focus on the care and well-being of their patients; some nurses may feel ill-equipped to enter the realm of policy and political activities. However, as you have examined previously, who better to advocate for patients and effective programs and polices than nurses? Already patient advocates in interactions with doctors and leadership, why not with government and regulatory agencies? In this Discussion, you will reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation./nTo Prepare: • In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy- making. • Review the Resources and reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation. By Day 3 of Week 9 Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you. Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described. Post an evaluation topic and a brief description of the evaluation. Discuss how social determinants impact this issue. By Day 6 of Week 9See Answer
Q8:Provide the full APA citation for the research article you are summarizing. Make the text very obvious (e.g., highlight it, change the text color, use bold text). Follow the heading with a bullet list summarizing the relevant information you have pulled from the research article. For each paper, make sure to bullet out (a) a description of the study purpose/aim, (b) a summary of the research findings and implications, and (c) an explanation of the relevance to your specific project. Repeat these steps for each source you are using in the development of your sexual health resource. Need to write summary in 3 pages, and then make the bibliography Need to make a poster also summary should be describing the poster Assignment FileSee Answer
Q9:Review the Resources and identify one change that you believe is called for in your organization/workplace. This may be a change necessary to effectively address one or more of the issues you addressed in the Workplace Environment Assessment you submitted in Module 4. It may also be a change in response to something not addressed in your previous efforts. It may be beneficial to discuss your ideas with your organizational leadership and/or colleagues to help identify and vet these ideas. Reflect on how you might implement this change and how you might communicate this change to organizational leadership. The Assignment (5-6-minute narrated PowerPoint presentation): Change Implementation and Management Plan Create a 5- or 6-slide narrated PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose./nYour narrated presentation should be 5-6 minutes in length. Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following: An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (This can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment previously submitted, if relevant.) A description of the change being proposed Justifications for the change, including why addressing it will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace Details about the type and scope of the proposed change Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the change Identification of a change management team (by title/role) A plan for communicating the change you proposeSee Answer
Q10:1st client says: "My son, Juanito, has a learning disability. He has a hard time in school. I know his teachers are frustrated with him, but I don't think they are doing enough to help him. We've only been in this country for three years; there have been a lot of changes in his life. It's hard for me too, but I try not to think about that too much." Write your paraphrasing response:See Answer
Q11:Need to add in the students solution file. (Topic - Smoking shops) WHAT TO ADD? 1) For each headline least 50-100 words express in a paragraph (total 2 pages) 2) Identify health issue. 3) Analyse the smoke shop health issue. 4) Score and purpose of no smoke shops in the community. 5) Priority population. SEE THE FILE IN SAMPLE (to get an idea)See Answer
Q12:PART TWO Search the literature for an intervention study that would be applicable for the problem (Leading Cause of Death or Chronic Disease) being addressed for the program plan. Attach the article to your discussion board post, and briefly provide an overview of the intervention strategies discussed in the article that will be useful for your program. For example the case study beginning on page 208 of the Zeni (2021) course textbook discusses an intervention study. On page 210, the first paragraph discusses the intervention strategies that were implemented. Another example is in an intervention study that I did. On page E10 under the Intervention heading, there is a description of the strategies that were done. The measures in the article that you choose can help define what measures you will use in your community program.See Answer
Q13:I need to respond to these 2 posts (150 words each with, references.) Post 1 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) define social determinants of health as complex, integrated, and overlapping social structures and economic systems that are responsible for most health inequities. Social determinants of health are shaped by the distribution of money, power, and resources throughout local communities, nations, and the world (Tobin-Tyler & Teitelbaum, 2019). Patients and families should be screened for Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) during a routine visit to a clinic because if it is determined that someone needs help or assistance, it is best to get resources available to them as soon as possible and this can prevent and reduce health disparities and improve health outcomes. Specific SDOH that should be screened for at each visit include access to food, income, and job status. Nutritious and affordable food are needed for optimal health and screening someone to see if they have a job and income can help determine if they may have trouble accessing food. An individual might not have enough food or access to food to feed their family if they do not have a job or do not have income. After completing an initial assessment of the Town of Holden, a specific SDOH that I would include in my screening would be access to/nfood. I would include this SDOH because I could educate my patient to where they can find affordable food, such as the local Wachusett Food Pantry or other programs that may be available to them to assist them in accessing food for their family. I want to share an article that I found that supports and is related to my response to the discussion board and screening for food availability. Having health food available and affordable in food retail and food service settings allows people to make healthier food choices (Whitman et al., 2022). When people have access to healthy foods it can lead to lower health care costs and improved health outcomes./nPost 2 According to Healthy People 2030 (n.d.), social determinants of health (SDOH) impact the ability of people to access available health services, to improve their quality-of-life outcomes. and to reduce risks. In addition, Orminski (2021) concluded that the most significant components of overall health outcomes and life expectancy was where people live. Thus, patients and families are screened for SDOH during a routine visit to the clinic. There are many tools that medical providers can use for screening for social determinants of health. AAFP (2018) introduced three common screening tools from three different sources, which are the National Association of Community Health Centers, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Accountable Health Communities. These tools all cover 5 core domains: food, housing, utilities, transportation, and personal safety. However, the tool from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) includes 8 more supplemental domains including financial strain, employment, family and community support, education, physical activity, substance use, mental health, and disabilities. This tool provides more essential information that is significantly important to understand more about patients. Therefore, at each visit, medical staff should focus on specific SDOH, including 5 categories, including: food, housing, utilities, transportation, and personal safety, and 7 supplemental domains as listed above, except disability domain. The writer's community are the elderly who are in the adult foster care program or attend the adult day care program in the writer's local areas. After completing an initial assessment, the writer would like to add the education's background of the member's caregivers who are supporting the member. In the screening tool developed by CMS, the tool just screens the patient's educational background. However, caregivers are key stakeholders that impact patient 's health outcomes (The wellness network, 2017). Thus, the writer would like to add in how the patient's evaluation about their caregiver's socio-economic backgrounds.See Answer
Q14:1. In the video it was stated that it costs more to provide care for obese individuals. Some organizations require obese employees to pay higher premiums. What are your thoughts on this practice? 2. In the video it was stated that we are living in a "damage control mode, waiting for people to get sick". How can we move to a preventative approach to this health care issue?See Answer
Q15:Describe at least three strategies you might apply when confronted with a possible conflict. (250 words) APA formatting/referencingSee Answer
Q16:Reporting errors in healthcare is an essential component of patient safety. For this assignment, you will assume that you are a healthcare administrator at a healthcare facility (Hospital, long-term care facility, clinic, etc.). You are tasked with creating a process for reporting errors and reducing adverse events at your facility. Your submission will demonstrate your knowledge of healthcare error reporting to create your process. Be sure to include at least one QI tool and discuss the process involved. Describe how your process aligns with current practices in KSA. Include current data on medical errors in healthcare settings within KSA and describe what the current gaps are. Your process should address these gaps that are published in the literature Your process should include the following: •An identification of the most prevalent and common medical errors in your facility • Risks associated with those medical errors • All individuals (staff, groups, agencies) who will be involved in the reporting process • Design a reporting template and be sure to include any workflow processes or tools that can be used in the process • Provide a brief evaluation of departments responsible for following up on the errors and events.See Answer
Q17:CHAPTER 2 REVIEW: BIOLOGIC AGING THEORIES AND LONGEVITY 1-Describe the “zip code effect” and what might account for it 2- Describe the difference between life span and life expectancy. Which one can individuals influence? Explain how the life expectancy of a 65-year-old person is greater than that of a newborn. 3-Define the Blue Zones. 4- Name 5 of the characteristics of Blue Zones. 5-List three reasons why women typically live longer than men. 6-Name five factors that influence longevity. Which influences are under our control? 7-How does race and ethnicity affect life expectancy in the United States? 8-What is the “compression of morbidity” and why is it desirable? 9-Give a brief example about how you might scientifically gather information about longevity. 10-Describe the drawbacks of each of the following types of studies on longevity: 11-How could the “accumulation of errors” influence aging? 12-What is the difference between random aging and programmed aging? 13-What are telomeres and how might they affect the rate at which we age? 14-List the factors in the physical environment which may affect length of life. 15-What are antioxidants and why are they important? How might they affect the aging process? 16-Discuss why those who are married tend to live longer than those who are not. What are some problems in studying this connection? 17-List the possible reasons why obesity increases the risk of premature death. 18-List reasons why people in the middle- and upper-income level live longer than those of low income. 19-Why might race and ethnicity influence life expectancy? 20-What are some reasons why women have a longer life expectancy than men? 21-What is the biological clock theory? What is the evidence for this theory? 22-Discuss how lifestyle factors may interplay with factors at the cellular level to affect longevity. 23-Outline three of the theories about why we might age. 24-Describe at least four of the factors associated with longevity in the blue zones. 25-Discuss at least five factors which affect the length of life. 26-Some believe the quest to prolong life in the laboratory is misplaced. Instead, they say, scientists should work on ways to modify those factors which affect disease onset. Do you agree or disagree? Write an essay to defend your position. 27-Describe and discuss the results of the New England Centenarian Study 28-Describe the genetic and behavioral hypotheses advanced to explain why women live longer than men. 29- Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of animal studies to determine the factors influencing longevity. See Answer
Q18:Discuss the sex ratio of women to men at ages 65, 75, 85. How does it change? What are the main reasons for this disparity? How does this disparity affect the country as a whole? See Answer
Q19:Describe culturally competent care c and how this could be achieved. See Answer
Q20:Choose one of four minority groups discussed in the text and describe their demography and cultural values that affect health care delivery to that group. Discuss ways to facilitate their access to needed services. See Answer

TutorBin Testimonials

I found TutorBin Health Assessment And Wellness And Community Health homework help when I was struggling with complex concepts. Experts provided step-wise explanations and examples to help me understand concepts clearly.

Rick Jordon

TutorBin experts resolve your doubts without making you wait for long. Their experts are responsive & available 24/7 whenever you need Health Assessment And Wellness And Community Health subject guidance.

Andrea Jacobs

I trust TutorBin for assisting me in completing Health Assessment And Wellness And Community Health assignments with quality and 100% accuracy. Experts are polite, listen to my problems, and have extensive experience in their domain.

Lilian King

I got my Health Assessment And Wellness And Community Health homework done on time. My assignment is proofread and edited by professionals. Got zero plagiarism as experts developed my assignment from scratch. Feel relieved and super excited.

Joey Dip

Popular Subjects for health assessment and wellness and community health

You can get the best rated step-by-step problem explanations from 65000+ expert tutors by ordering TutorBin health assessment and wellness and community health homework help.

TutorBin helping students around the globe

TutorBin believes that distance should never be a barrier to learning. Over 500000+ orders and 100000+ happy customers explain TutorBin has become the name that keeps learning fun in the UK, USA, Canada, Australia, Singapore, and UAE.